AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Farnaz Khoromi

ENG250 · ELDT125 · ELDT124 · ENGE250 · ENGE200 · MATH38 · ENGE260 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and textbooks and can ace a few high-stakes exams; many advise avoiding if you have another option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough graderGraded by few thingsConfusing lecturesPolarizing engineering gatekeeper
  • Many engineering students warn of , and grades driven by a few tests.
  • A minority online report that watching lectures and .
  • Recurring complaints include delayed help, old recorded videos, and teaching that .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A few call certain sections easy As, but , and harsh grading make high marks hard-earned or unlikely.

Online has both Easy A and brutal-test reports; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Statics, circuits, and electronics material is tough, and students say her delivery often makes it harder.

Both formats describe hard content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and warn against skipping when lectures or tests move quickly.

; online still expects presence at timed tests and lecture viewing.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and though a minority praise workable online or dynamics courses.

Online has a higher share of positive outliers; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and test-heavy schemes dominate student complaints.

Format shift

; a couple of online or dynamics reviews sound more forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

but often counts little; the real burden is preparing for a few brutal exams.

Format shift

Online homework time is sometimes called two hours weekly; .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Frequent reports of , weak help, outdated videos, and content mismatch with exams outweigh scattered praise.

Format shift

Online praise centers on usable lecture videos when students self-drive; in-person has more clarity and support complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple reviews say three or .

Format shift

Both online and in-person engineering sections are described as test heavy with graded-by-few-things tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and exam-centered grading, with a few older positives in dynamics or electronics if you already have strong math.

Main concern

, and lectures or old videos may not prepare you.

What students said

“ late and lecture videos do not prepare you for exams.”
ENGE260
“Uses pre-recorded lectures from COVID (6 year old videos), you never get your scores/grades back.”
ELDT124
“If you want to learn Dynamics and get A, .”
ENGE250

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some say lecture videos plus homework lead to fine tests, while , and timed uploads brutal.

Main concern

and weak email or tutoring support.

What students said

“if you watch the hour-or-hour-and-a-half lecture videos each week and sit down to do the hours, you will do just fine on the tests.”
ENGE200
“ !!!!!! she is bad at teaching. .”
ENGE200
“You will have only 75 mins to write down all solutions for 5 questions and and upload it in that time frame.”
ENGE200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is high because a and leave little room for mistakes.

Test heavyLittle partial creditTimed online upload examsHomework low weight

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections are repeatedly described as graded mostly on a .

3-4 major testsHarsh exam gradingHomework low percentage
“ and practically no partial credit is given. no options and 90% of the grade is based on 3 exams.”
ENGE260
“85% of grade is based on 3 or 4 tests from which each has like 5-7 q's”
ENGE200

Online

several problems, photograph work, and upload PDFs, with little .

75-minute multi-question timed examsPhoto and PDF uploadNo extra credit in some terms
“You will have only 75 mins to write down all solutions for 5 questions and and upload it in that time frame.”
ENGE200
“3 Exams and No EC, all of the HW counts for very little of the grade.”
ENGE200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ late and lecture videos do not prepare you for exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 engineering and math-adjacent reviews, weighting harsh-test and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ ”

📝

28/100

“90% of the grade is based on 3 exams.”

🎯 Teaching Concerns

34/100

“ and her accent adds to the barrier of learning.”

✅ Positive Outlier Path

70/100

“If you want to learn Dynamics and get A, .”

Theme 1

📉

  • and practically no partial credit is given.
  • 3 Exams and No EC, all of the HW counts for very little of the grade.
  • she makes it impossible to make any mistakes.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • She has no clue about the subject.
  • The
  • Uses pre-recorded lectures from COVID (6 year old videos), you never get your scores/grades back.

Theme 3

👍 About Positive Experiences

  • Easy A class
  • If you want to learn Dynamics and get A, .
  • , and you'll have no problem passing the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews are enough to see a , but the sample is smaller and somewhat polarized across courses and formats.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGE2007 reviews
ELDT1243 reviews
ELDT1251 review
ENG2501 review
ENGE2501 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGE2601 review
MATH381 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1