AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Todor Kitchev

MATH48 · MATH46 · MATH252 · MATH96 · MATH34 · MATH254 · ELEMSTATS119 · MATH151 · MATH119 · KITCHEV22855 · MATH104 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
80.95%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will do the homework and attend; be wary of .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesLots of homeworkTest heavyClear grading criteriaLecture heavy
  • and strong concept breakdowns.
  • and rewards staying on top of daily practice.
  • Online sections and some higher courses draw sharp criticism for impossible or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn As with homework and attendance, but and .

In person, As are reachable with steady work; online reviews more often report harsh exams and Ds.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from and higher math with real challenge.

In-person difficulty feels fair with strong lectures; online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews say attendance is required or strongly needed to keep up and .

as mandatory; online still expects engagement and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

About 81% would take again and many call him the complaints.

In-person recommendations are enthusiastic; several online students say .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Homework and attendance can be lenient and curves appear, but and .

Format shift

; in person is more often called fair.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of online or , and multiple exams are consistent themes.

Format shift

; online adds Pearson volume and timed tests.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students repeatedly praise crystal-clear explanations and or unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person; online support and presence draw more criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple exams and a heavy final drive the grade, with but .

Format shift

and cumulative finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is widely seen as a , and often excellent math lecturer who helps students who attend and do the work.

Main concern

Lots of , and tough but usually fair exams.

What students said

“ my life.”
MATH254
“Breaks down difficult concepts in easy-to-digest bits. .”
MATH46
“ as long as you do the homework and go to the lectures. There is a ton of homework though.”
MATH96

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lectures can be organized, but several report hands-off support, , and grade crashes.

Main concern

, and often produce very low class averages.

What students said

“His exams are TERRIBLE/IMPOSSIBLE (50% avg final,more than half failed his class)”
MATH252
“My grade dropped from a 86% in the class to a D. ... The final exam average was 40% (with the curve).”
MATH151
“he was very hands-off and . Went to his office hours the , but he didn't show up.”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often fair and , but online and as too hard, poorly aligned, or high-fail.

Test heavyHomework-aligned exams in personNote cards sometimes allowedPearson or timed online examsLow final averages reported online

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

allow note cards, and feel fair if you study and attend.

Similar to homeworkNote cards on examsDrop exam with good attendanceFair grader
“ ”
MATH46
“You can use note cards on the exams and a page for the final.”
MATH119

Online

Online students report test-heavy Pearson-style exams with too many questions, little time, and finals that crash class averages.

Pearson examsTimed testsMisaligned practice vs finalHigh fail rates
“ and has TOO many questions and too LITTLE time”
MATH252
“For the final exam, he assigned 50 practice problems- none were on the final.”
MATH151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews (6 online, 24 in , and format-split exam risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Clarity

78/100

“His lectures were very easy to comprehend... my life.”

📚

32/100

“There is a ton of homework though, so you will have to stay on top of it to not fall behind.”

⚠️

35/100

“ !!!! His exams are TERRIBLE/IMPOSSIBLE (50% avg final,more than half failed his class)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Breaks down difficult concepts in easy-to-digest bits
  • and his technique of using many
  • I actually enjoyed learning algebra. !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if your in class
  • just try to listen to his lecture, you coud got 100pts in the test easily
  • The majority of the class failed the final, and it ruined my 4.0.

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of
  • the material to succeed
  • doing the hw actually helps you do significantly well on the exams

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

30 detailed reviews spanning 2014-2026 with consistent in-person praise and .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH467 reviews
MATH1046 reviews
MATH964 reviews
MATH1193 reviews
MATH343 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH2522 reviews
ELEMSTATS1191 review
KITCHEV228551 review
MATH1511 review
MATH2541 review
MATH481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

5

D+ 1 · D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1