AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Leanna Jones

DSGN153 · ARTG153 · ART153 · ARTG143 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
95.83%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want serious design growth and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackIndustry readyHeavy workloadCaringAccessible outside class
  • Exceptional UX and interaction design instruction with detailed professional critique.
  • and industry skills.
  • Extremely high take-again rate; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A grades, but , and active participation.

Both formats reward effort; online has a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Interaction and , and time intensive.

Difficulty is high in both formats; online long lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as mandatory and central to success.

Online and and participating every class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Near-universal praise and roughly 96 percent take-again support for her design courses.

Recommendation stays extremely strong across online and in-person sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

and constructive rather than free; effort and revision usually lead to strong grades.

Format shift

Most formats call her fair and supportive; a minority online review wants clearer criteria.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Portfolio projects, critiques, research, and software practice create a consistently heavy load.

Format shift

Heavy in both formats; online still demands full multi-hour class presence plus homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students call her one of the , and industry relevance.

Format shift

Excellence is consistent online and in person, with only rare process complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is project, critique, and portfolio .

Format shift

, and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In , and transformative for web and mobile design skills.

Main concern

Strict attendance and .

What students said

“She cares about every student, working with them outside of class A LOT.”
ARTG143
“Her classes are a lot of work, but EVERYTHING she teaches you is very valuable to get you ready for the real world.”
ARTG153
“If you work hard, show up, and this class.”
ARTG143

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and portfolio-focused, with and required participation.

Main concern

Long live lectures and if .

What students said

“ , and by the end of the semester you'll clearly see how much you've grown.”
DSGN153
“The workload of this course is pretty heavy, but I found it engaging and rewarding.”
ARTG143
“She does not provide clear instructions .”
ARTG143

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and process work instead of high-stakes proctored exams.

Project basedDesign critiquesPortfolio workNo proctored exams mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and process work with mandatory participation.

Project revisionsOne-on-one feedbackIndustry skills
“She gives your work a realistic critique and teaches you skills and lectures about what is current to the industry.”
ARTG153
“Expect a , and back and forth revisions.”
ARTG143

Online

, and participation; no webcam or Lockdown Browser evidence.

Project basedDesign reviewsParticipation required
“you will be required to do design reviews/critiques for both projects.”
ARTG153
“gave thorough and . I enjoyed taking her class”
ARTG143

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Leanna expects a lot out of her class but gives back more than she receives.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, , and near-universal recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Beyond an amazing professor. She gives your work a realistic critique and teaches you skills.”

👍

96/100

“ best.”

🛠️ Workload Intensity

28/100

“This not a class you can slack off in or just blow off because it will show up in your work and grade.”

💬

95/100

“Leanna is the only professor I and comments on everything to help you improve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can really make complex material feel approachable without diluting its essence.
  • Her lectures are fun and super insightful.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You're gonna have to work for your grade.
  • and .
  • If you put in the effort, you will get so much out of her class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares about every student.
  • Awesome human being!
  • A true pearl

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-eight highly consistent reviews with , and career value.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTG14326 reviews
ARTG15316 reviews
ART1535 reviews
DSGN1531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 4 · A 21 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5