AI Rate Professor

English

Manuel Lopez

ENG205 · 50336ENG49 · ENGL105 · ENG47A · ENG049 · CRN01521 · ENG105 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGL205 · ENGLC1001 · ENG247 · 66812ENG · ENGL249A · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.3%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and are willing to participate and go a bit beyond the baseline for an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorAmazing lecturesGreat essay feedbackParticipation-drivenB-baseline grading
  • Students , and one of the best English professors they have had.
  • Doing all assigned work typically lands a B; extra effort and engagement are needed for an A.
  • Online sections feel lighter and more flexible; and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A-range, but completing only the baseline work usually yields a B and extra effort is needed for an A.

Online reviews describe light weekly tasks; in-person reviews stress participation and the B-to-A extra-work rule.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and literature with reading and writing, not abstract theory, though higher lit sections expect more reading.

Online ENGL101 is repeatedly called easy and organized; and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Online students often report optional attendance, while and participation counts.

; in-person evidence consistently marks attendance as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Nearly all students would take him again and , and .

Both formats recommend him strongly, with only rare complaints about political themes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

as fair and , though the base-B policy means an A is not automatic.

Format shift

Same B-baseline theme appears in both online and in-person comments.

Workload

Light

68/100

, and most students say the load is manageable if deadlines are kept.

Format shift

Online weekly work feels light; and creative projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

, and inspiring lectures that improve writing.

Format shift

Strong praise holds across online and in-person sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and group work rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online is mostly weekly assignments; in-person adds participation and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and writing feedback, with students praising his care and lecture style.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and some students dislike a heavy political or social-justice focus.

What students said

“His class is on a bundle scale; you do all your work, you get a B, you do extra, you get an A.”
ENGLC1001
“Fun and caring professor who wants to see his students succeed. Very fair and participation.”
ENG101
“ and helps you a lot to improve your writing skills and to develop creative thinking.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and centered on weekly readings plus one discussion, response, or short essay.

Main concern

Social-justice themes can feel repetitive for some students, and the B baseline still requires extra work for an A.

What students said

“ and discussion posts but nothing overwhelming.”
ENGL101
“Caring teacher and workload isnt heavy. and he is very communicative in his emails.”
ENGL101
“The class was very comforting and welcoming when it came to expression and sharing creative work.”
ENG247

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers, discussions, and presentations more than strict proctored exams, so overall assessment feels student-friendly.

Essay-based assessmentDiscussion postsCreative writing feedbackGroup presentations

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, participation, and occasional group presentations; exam logistics are rarely specified.

Essay feedbackParticipation gradingGroup projects
“ so , and helps you improve your writing.”
ENG101
“Easy group presentation for final.”
ENG101

Online

Online courses are described as weekly readings with discussion posts, critical responses, or essays and .

Weekly discussion postsShort essaysEmail-based communication
“every week there is 1 reading which includes an response, or an essay.”
ENGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Manuel is one of the to learn from.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews spanning online and , and grading structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Professor Lopez is the . and very understanding.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ and learning from the Chicano perspective. !”

📝

78/100

“you do all your work, you get a B, you do extra, you get an A.”

❤️ Student Support

92/100

“whenever I asked him for help, he was always willing to help me with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • he finds a way to get students to get involved in learning
  • very poetic, if his lecture is not necessarily to learn a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy class so long you get the work done around the due date
  • His class is easy, as long you do your work
  • beware of the B base line in his class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He's one of the kindest people I've ever met
  • He really cares for his students and wants them to exceed and excel
  • super understanding and will help you as best as he can

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed reviews span many years with highly consistent praise for , and .

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1018 reviews
ENGL1017 reviews
ENG0492 reviews
ENG1052 reviews
ENG2052 reviews
Show 9 more courses
50336ENG491 review
66812ENG1 review
CRN015211 review
ENG2471 review
ENG47A1 review
ENGL1051 review
ENGL2051 review
ENGL249A1 review
ENGLC10011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 5 · A 14 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1