AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael George

MATH121 · STATS119 · MATH46 · MATH96 · MATH95 · MATH116 · MATHM116 · MATH119 · MATH104 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you already excel at math and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDoes not teachTest mismatchSelf-study requiredKind but ineffective
  • Most students say he knows math but and .
  • Exams often feel harder or and practice, with .
  • A small minority find some lower courses passable if and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Comments cite low A , and little teaching support, so an A usually requires exceptional self-study.

Online tips claim only about 10 percent earn A; , and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

Material feels much harder because , and tests go beyond class examples.

; a few older MATH119 notes are easier if .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, while others warn that skipping hurts quizzes and notes-based credit.

as not mandatory; several in-person reviews say show up or you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

The vast majority and misaligned exams.

and in-person, with only rare positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and grades driven almost entirely by exams rather than learning support.

Format shift

Both formats describe hard, high-stakes testing; a few mention partial credit or .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and self-teaching on top of create a heavy effective load.

Format shift

Online and and .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is that he is knowledgeable but cannot teach, with , and off-topic lectures.

Format shift

Negative teaching critiques are consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

and ; homework and notes quizzes matter less than test performance.

Format shift

; online also centers practice vs real exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative about teaching quality, with many withdrawals and .

Main concern

Students say he does not teach concepts, rambles, and sets students up to .

What students said

“ . I had to withdraw, and I am a smart student.”
MATH96
“Even though this professor has a .”
MATH119
“Do yourself a .”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely called confusing and poorly explained, with students .

Main concern

Lectures do not prepare weaker students; calculus and algebra online with him are frequently described as a bad decision.

What students said

“He is smart and knows what he's doing but is a poor explainer to someone who is not math expert.”
MATH121
“ and he is very boring”
MATH119
“ , so .”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students repeatedly say practice or and tests are hard, short, and high-stakes.

Exams unlike practiceShort high-point testsTest heavyPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as short, difficult, and often different from homework or lecture examples.

Short hard testsMismatch with homeworkTest heavy
“The tests are worth 100points with only 6 questions on the test.”
MATH96
“exams are completely different than ”
MATH96

Online

Online comments say practice exams may match for prepared students, but lectures still leave many unprepared and .

Practice exam tipsHard finalsCompletion homework
“ .”
MATH121
“The exam”
MATH121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He knows math but can not teach. AVOID if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews across online and and exam risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Brilliant man but not an effective educator.”

🚫 Recommendation

16/100

“If you have the .”

📉

28/100

“ nor what the notes he gave us said.”

📚

20/100

“ unless you want to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Zoom lectures were boring and confusing
  • His lecture includes only doing a couple problems from the HW, he doesn't TEACH us how to do the material
  • lectures are useless and sometimes not even about math

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only 10% of students get an A typically
  • This class destroyed my self esteem
  • Unless you want to be challenged to solve calculus level problems...

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • Students leave 30 minutes into class
  • SO BORING many students left midway through class often

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews over many years show highly consistent criticism of teaching effectiveness and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH1168 reviews
MATH1195 reviews
MATH964 reviews
MATH1043 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
Show 4 more courses
STATS1192 reviews
MATH461 review
MATH951 review
MATHM1161 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3