AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Candice Lopez

HISTORYOFGD · ART133 · GRAPHICDESIGN · ARTG118 · ART118 · ALL · 111 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
92.86%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her for design history or studio courses if , and a high grade for consistent work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVideo Feedback QueenInspirational Design MentorClear Grading CriteriaPortfolio-Ready Journal ProjectsEasy A With Effort
  • Nearly universal praise for and .
  • Graphic design history stays manageable if you watch lectures and keep the journal current.
  • , and organized Canvas make high grades realistic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Most students report A or A+ with steady journal work, video revisions, , and As.

Online reviews stress easy credit and drafts; if you stay on the journal and pay attention.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is design history and style recognition, which most call interesting and learnable, with average difficulty around moderate rather than brutal.

; online summer sections can feel faster paced.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

and optional in others, with online often more flexible if work is submitted.

Online comments more often say attendance was not mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

About 93 percent would take again, with overwhelming praise for , and organization outweighing a small set of tough reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and repeated video revision chances help most students reach A territory.

Format shift

A minority of in-person and online students call her a tough reviser, but grades still trend high.

Workload

Light

74/100

Core load is video lectures, discussions, a semester journal or and .

Format shift

Online accelerated terms feel busier; many still call workload light if you do not procrastinate.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly praise inspiring lectures, contagious passion, accessibility, and unusually thorough video feedback.

Format shift

Strengths hold online and in person; rare critics cite jargon or long slide lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment blends a major journal or , and discussion posts.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person classes add museum visits, guest designers, and live energy, with the and .

Main concern

A few students find long video-heavy lectures or strict revision expectations tiring.

What students said

“You will enjoy and learn so much about different styles of design. She cares about her students and .”
ARTG118
“Very easy class, if you keep up with the workload, pay attention and ask questions when needed.”
HISTORYOFGD
“There is one big assignment due at the end of the semester, so .”
ART118

Remote format

Online

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections shine with , and light-to-moderate project pacing that students call easy credit with care.

Main concern

Occasional noon weekday deadlines, app compatibility issues on a , and rare complaints about jargon-heavy history language.

What students said

“ . We didn't need to buy the textbook, instead she made fantastic videos for each chapter.”
ART118
“I loved working on the final project all semester, so you know exactly what she's looking for.”
ARTG118
“This class was very easy, so definitely easy credit.”
ARTG118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are thorough but widely called fair and manageable if you watch lectures and use practice materials.

Midterm and FinalPractice ExamsLecture-BasedProject Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a semester journal, often with helpful practice videos before exams.

Midterm and FinalQuizzesJournal ProjectPractice Exam Videos
“A couple quizzes, spread throughout the course, the mid-term and .”
ART118
“The and and finals are really helpful too.”
ART118

Online

Online students describe two tests plus a as the main prep source.

Two TestsProject BasedYouTube Lectures
“There are 2 tests, and a .”
ARTG118
“I .”
ARTG118

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting feedback, ease, and mentorship themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Her love of the subject is contagious.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ because Professor Lopez is really passionate.”

💬

95/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Accessibility

84/100

“Stay on top of your work, this class is an easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All of her lectures were so presentable and inspirational.
  • You can really tell she's passionate about what she teaches.
  • Have strong logic and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very easy class, if you keep up with the workload.
  • Workload was light and it was a lot of fun.
  • I was able to get my grade from a B- to an A with the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Access

  • and approachable.
  • I never waited more than a day for .
  • She is extremely passionate about the subject and truly wants to positively impact every student.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

111

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years, mostly consistent praise for feedback and grades, with both online and in-person coverage.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5101
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART11824 reviews
ARTG11821 reviews
ART1332 reviews
ALL1 review
GRAPHICDESIGN1 review
Show 1 more courses
HISTORYOFGD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 13 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1