AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brenda Long

MATH141 · MATH104 · MATH46 · MATH96 · MATH046 · MATH096 · MATH150 · MATH151 · STATS · MATH119X · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her in person for stats or lower math if you want a caring teacher and ; be cautious with online calculus.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkTest heavyCaring but fastMyLab dependentPolarizing math instructor
  • In-person stats and and caring if you keep up with .
  • Online and some calculus sections draw , and weak teaching structure.
  • , and tolerance for fast lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with consistent work, but , and no free curves make an easy A uncommon.

Online reviews report harsher outcomes and more C/F/drop experiences than many in-person stats praise pieces.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Math content, fast lectures, and students.

; online and calculus feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as ; many others say skip class and you will not pass.

; in-person often stresses showing up for lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About seventy percent would take again; fans love her care and clarity while and workload.

calculus experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some note retries, notes on exams, and late HW; and .

Format shift

Online MyLab grading draws more tough-grader .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of daily practice plus tests.

Format shift

as extreme.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Many praise clear step-by-step help and care; others .

Format shift

online platform-heavy sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, finals, and .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are often praised as , and thorough, but fast lectures, lots of homework, and .

Main concern

Pace can leave students behind; homework and .

What students said

“statistics is a pretty difficult class, but professor Long is an ”
Stats
“she doesn't finish the lecture until everyone understands, she's very sweet and accessible outside of class”
Math119x
“She talked a lot about math, but none of what she said made sense.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections often feel like self-study through MyLab or Hawkes with , and limited effective teaching.

Main concern

, and weak or missing lectures frustrate many students.

What students said

“ ! My experience was online... 10-15hrs of .”
MATH141
“I might as well have taken a and cut out the middle man.”
MATH150
“Take her class! if you do your work you will be fine. Lots of HW but she is such a nice and fair woman.”
MATH151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and often platform-based; some in-person stats allow notes, while online policies vary by course.

Test heavyMyLab or HawkesNotes sometimes allowedOnline open book reported

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some stats sections allow notes and offer retries, but .

Test heavyNotes on examsOnline HW platformsRetries sometimes
“lets us use notes in exams”
Stats
“ as the eGrader was very finicky.”
MATH150

Online

Online exams often run through MyLab or Hawkes with ; one report notes open-book tests in a hybrid-style setup.

MyLab testsHawkes examsStrict answer gradingHeavy homework
“1 midterm (1 pg notes, front/back) & 1 final (2 pgs). Uses MyMathLab.”
MATH141
“ . So . ”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm not a math person but and precise way. I appreciate her willingness to not move forward until the class understands.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews (11 online, 29 in and platform friction. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Split

58/100

“She doesn't finish the lecture until everyone understands, she's very sweet and accessible outside of class.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“10-15hrs of .”

🧪

40/100

“ but and kind”

💻 Online Caution

35/100

“I might as well have taken a and cut out the middle man.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes kinda fast and everything is a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • If you work hard you will get A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • super sweet
  • really cares that you learn the material
  • good person, but not so good at teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years and formats show a , pace, and platforms.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH4613 reviews
MATH1506 reviews
MATH1415 reviews
Math119x4 reviews
MATH0963 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1513 reviews
MATH962 reviews
Stats2 reviews
MATH0461 review
MATH1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 6