AI Rate Professor

English

Siobhan White

ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · ENG49 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · ENGL49 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if and ; show up for workshops and use revisions.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackDraft workshopsCaringOnline Savvy
  • and draft feedback makes writing manageable.
  • Most students report real skill gains and ; older harsh-personality reviews exist.
  • Attendance often helps workshops; and flexible due dates.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and revisions make an A reachable with steady work, though she can be a .

and lenient due dates; in-person reviewers stress workshops and rewrites.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable English writing with interesting topics, but readings and .

Both formats describe manageable difficulty; online often rated slightly easier for busy adults.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as not mandatory or flexible, yet workshops and some classes penalize skips heavily.

Online is clearly flexible with recordings; help.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Near-universal would-take-again among modern reviews for , and writing growth despite a few old negative outliers.

Online reviews are uniformly glowing; in-person is strongly positive overall with older harsh-personality complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and revision opportunities help grades; though essays can be stricter.

Format shift

Online students highlight fast grading and ; in-person students emphasize rewrites.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Several papers, readings, peer review, and staged drafts; workload is real but scaffolded.

Format shift

Online called manageable; and reading.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and real writing improvement.

Format shift

Online teaching strength is a standout; terms.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and homework rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students love clear criteria, in-class draft workshops, and ; a minority of older reviews call her intimidating or rude.

Main concern

Expect , and ; personality felt harsh to a few students.

What students said

“Seriously one of the ”
ENG101
“If you participate, speak up and stay pretty on track with the so easy to get an A.”
ENG101
“This professor is really demanding and rude. I wanted to run out of the classroom on the very first day.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online English sections are highly praised for dates, and manageable workload.

Main concern

and following multi-part assignment steps.

What students said

“She is a and . All of her assignments lead up to her 3 essays”
ENG101
“Siobhan recorded everything so you could watch it later. Very useful for adults with busy lives.”
205
“This online class during the pandemic was a lifesaver. This instructor really knows and easy to follow.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and revisions rather than proctored exams.

Essay-based assessmentDraft workshopsClear rubricsRevisions allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and in-class draft workshops; exams are not the main risk.

In-class workshopsEssay revisionsPeer review
“She looks over your drafts in class before you turn them in.”
ENG101
“If you follow her instructions its hard to not get a good grade but if you want you can rewrite the .”
101

Online

Online work is assignment- and ; no webcam or Lockdown Browser policies mentioned.

Essay scaffoldingClear instructionsRecorded lectures
“All of her assignments lead up to her 3 essays, she splits it up so that way by the time you are done which each part, you have the full rough draft with feedback.”
ENG101
“ and reviewed essays before they were due”
205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I LOVED Siobhan's class. She treats students like human beings, is accomodating for real live events and makes sure that the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, balancing recent online praise with . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

88/100

“One of the clearest and most useful English classes I've ever taken”

📝

90/100

“She looks over your drafts in class before you turn them in. Seriously one of the ”

👍 Recommendation Strength

90/100

“If you participate, speak up and stay pretty on track with the so easy to get an A.”

⚠️ Personality Split

35/100

“She's the meanest professor I've ever had. Didn't really learn much in class because I was scared of her personality and tone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as simple and direct and she is always quick at answering emails
  • Always respectful and often funny.
  • She lays out the and gives a bunch of help by having you do parts of your paper

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy A.
  • I wouldn't call the class easy exactly, but she does grade the .
  • As long as you do your readings and class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She treats students like human beings
  • Siobhan is chill and friendly
  • This professor is really demanding and rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews spanning many years with detailed comments and mostly consistent praise for clarity and feedback.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG10115 reviews
ENG20511 reviews
2058 reviews
ENGLISH2053 reviews
1012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENGL1012 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
ENG491 review
ENGL491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1