AI Rate Professor

English

Virgina Jackson

ENGLISH205 · ENG43 · ENGLISH43 · ENG101 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
38.89%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Skip unless and no-shows; pick another ENG professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo-shows without noticeTough unclear graderTwilight-centered contentUnprofessional lecturesPolarized feedback
  • Frequent no-shows and late vague lectures frustrate students
  • and
  • A minority praise one-on-one writing help and feedback

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tough grading, picky formatting deductions, and .

Online and ; online includes a reported F despite effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is intro English but made feel limited and overcomplicated around one book and .

Both formats center narrow book-based work; difficulty ratings cluster mid-to-high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skipping hurts your grade.

In-person is clearly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and most recent voices urge choosing a different professor.

Positive older in-person notes exist, but recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and minor format deductions.

Format shift

Online and and harsh.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and participation matter more than a .

Format shift

Online emphasizes papers and ; and one-book focus.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

No-shows, vague lectures, and weak help outweigh a few reports of .

Format shift

In-person no-shows drive frustration; online lacks lectures and writing aids.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Papers, participation, and .

Format shift

; most talk about papers and weekly work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person sections suffer from no-shows, attendance sheets, narrow Twilight focus, and mixed help quality.

Main concern

Disrespectful of time and .

What students said

“She no-showed to class multiple times without notice.”
ENG101
“Genuinely one of the .”
ENG101
“Her grading is rather obscure. .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG101 is poorly supported with , and little writing help.

Main concern

and risk of failing despite effort.

What students said

“One , and instructions and .”
ENG101
“Boring and not helpful”
ENG101
“the class mainly focused on playwriting and the book Twilight Los Angeles 1992.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and focus more on papers and .

Unclear grading criteriaAssignment-focusedLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment centers on papers, participation, and occasional tests.

Participation mattersPapers and readingTest heavy (limited mention)
“ if you misunderstand something minor”
ENG101

Online

Online comments stress unclear assignment instructions and .

Unclear assignment rulesTough grader
“instructions and . Feedback was always " Please review, or refer to this"”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Genuinely one of the . Skip this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 , and polarized help. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Reliability Issues

28/100

“She no-showed to class multiple times without notice. It was frustrating and disrespectful of students' time.”

📉

28/100

“Her grading is rather obscure. .”

📚 Narrow Course Focus

40/100

“The entire class was centered around a book called Twilight.”

Theme 1

⏰ and No-Shows

  • She no-showed to class multiple times without notice.
  • No showed class several times without letting us know.
  • wouldnt show up to class and didnt let us know

Theme 2

📝 and Feedback

  • , and instructions and
  • Grades are always posted as late as possible

Theme 3

❤️ Minority Positive Help

  • The Professor is helpful. Other people just mad.
  • She helped alot with writing and one on one with everybody.
  • Always asked if we needed more help and stayed after class to help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

18 detailed reviews across recent years with consistent no-show and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG10114 reviews
ENGLISH432 reviews
ENG431 review
English2051 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1