AI Rate Professor

Chicano Studies

Jorge Hernandez

CHICANO · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedNo grade visibilityPaper heavyFun lecturesSlow feedback
  • Low 2.4 average quality with only about 20% would-take-again.
  • Students can still pass, but and .
  • , and weak organization dominate the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students report As and A+, but opaque grading and .

All evidence is in person; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is teachable and sometimes fun, but volume of papers and long video reflections raises the challenge.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and repeated complaints about organization and communication outweigh lecture praise.

Recommendation signals are weak and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but students cannot track progress and find criteria inconsistently communicated.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, and very long assigned videos create a heavy semester load.

Format shift

Workload complaints are entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Lectures can be fun and knowledgeable, but disorganization, forgetfulness, and .

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is only in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is paper- and reflection-heavy with video write-ups, projects, and a .

Format shift

Assignment-heavy pattern is documented only for in-person classes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Chicano sections have enjoyable lectures but , and little grade access.

Main concern

, and ignored emails.

What students said

“He has not graded any assignments during our 8 weeks together, so I have no idea what grade I am getting.”
chicano
“ and note-taking.”
chicano
“I didn't know my grade for the whole semester, and sometimes the . ”
chicano

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and a .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and community service rather than proven proctored exams.

Many papersVideo reflectionsCommunity service final
“One thing I enjoyed was the community service as a final.”
chicano
“ and note-taking.”
chicano

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has not graded any assignments during our 8 weeks together, so I have no idea what grade I am getting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Organization Issues

28/100

“is not the .”

📄

24/100

“ and note-taking.”

📉 Grade Opacity

30/100

“He was one of the few who didn't allow access to our grades throughout the whole course.”

🎤 Lecture Upside

55/100

“His lectures were fun, and very informative.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures were fun, and very informative
  • has a lot of knowledge and is caring
  • teaches it well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no idea what grade I am getting
  • didn't allow access to our grades
  • so many papers

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • forgetful of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only five recent reviews with one non-substantive comment; themes align but sample size and detail limits keep credibility medium.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

chicano5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2