AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Breanna Prewitt

POLI140 · POLI102 · POL101 · POLI101 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want deep political science learning and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy readingNo exams oftenCaring professorContent heavyDual-enrollment intensive
  • Most students praise her passion, humor, and care, with about 85% would-take-again.
  • lots of reading, papers, and accelerated 8-week or dual-enrollment intensity.
  • Often few or no traditional exams, but late policies and volume can crush grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible, but , and hard grading mean an A requires sustained effort.

Online includes an F from overload; in person shows more A/B outcomes with heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Average difficulty about 3.4 with content-heavy lectures and constant reading/writing.

Both formats describe high content load; online accelerated terms feel especially hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and others optional, especially online.

Online ; many in-person sections list mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and learning, despite workload complaints.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online reviews are split between love and overwhelm.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

She is understanding if you communicate, but several students say she grades hard and late work is punished.

Format shift

; online notes flexibility when students email early.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, papers, discussions, and projects, especially in 8-week and dual-enrollment formats.

Format shift

Both online and ; online accelerated is harshest.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students call her amazing, hilarious, unbiased, and deeply caring, with engaging lectures.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in person and mostly strong online aside from workload frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects, discussions, reading summaries, and quizzes dominate; multiple reviews say few or no tests.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students love her lectures and care, but call the workload heavy and if you fall behind.

Main concern

Late policy and dual-enrollment volume can tank grades despite learning a lot.

What students said

“The workload is heavy but very rewarding.”
POLI101
“the course is group based and .”
POL101
“While you do learn a LOT, it comes at the price of a LOT of time. Late policy kills your grade even if everythings in.”
POL101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

- and discussion-heavy; strong students thrive, overwhelmed students struggle hard.

Main concern

Accelerated online pace with and .

What students said

“hard class I wouldn't take her again she too much work and its super hard to keep up”
POLI102
“There is a lot of reading in this class but I think it is a fair trade off for .”
POLI102
“A lot of reading and discussion assignments to get through for each week but if you keep in touch with the professor ... .”
POLI140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many sections replace traditional exams with projects, discussions, and reading responses.

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews frequently describe project-based or group-based courses with few or no tests.

Few or no testsGroup projectsLecture heavy
“not a lot of .”
POLI102
“The. course is group based and .”
POL101

Online

Online , and discussion posts instead.

No exams or testsReading summariesDiscussion postsInQuizitive quizzes
“a fair trade off for .”
POLI102
“ to use. There were summaries that had to be a page long”
POLI101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The workload is heavy but very rewarding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, , and project-based assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She's an amazing professor who knows how to teach and is passionate about political science.”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“hard class I wouldn't take her again she too much work and its super hard to keep up”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“When my brother passed away during the course, she donated to my go fund me for him and offered a independent study opportunity.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“The content was also very informative and still one of my fav classes. TAKE HER CLASS!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hilarious and unbiased lectures
  • goes very in detail with her lectures
  • wants you to enjoy it and participate

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • workload is heavy but very rewarding
  • Late policy kills your grade
  • she grades hard, but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She truly cares
  • always makes times for her students
  • could be a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews from 2020-2026 with and assessment detail plus mixed grade outcomes support solid high-medium credibility.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLI1015 reviews
POLI1025 reviews
POL1012 reviews
POLI1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values