AI Rate Professor

English

Dustin Marquel

ENG205 · ENGLISH205 · C0S124 · ENG49 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGL205 · ENGLISH49 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
55%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will read, write, and ; be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious DiscussionsHeavy ReadingParticipation HeavyUnclear Grading ScalePaper Heavy
  • In-person English often praised as fun, energetic, and discussion-driven with many As reported.
  • Online and COVID-era notes flag weak , and .
  • Lots of reading and papers; attendance and participation .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many As if you do weekly work and papers, but and .

; online reports drops and tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English difficulty with .

Online adds self-teaching burden; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn skipping will sink you.

; online also often marks attendance yes for synchronous work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; lovers cite humor and growth while critics cite arrogance and chaos.

In-person recommendation is stronger; online recent reviews are cooler.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Complete/incomplete systems and and unclear scale complaints.

Format shift

Online feedback sparse; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly readings, many short papers, and .

Format shift

; in-person adds debates and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Energetic lectures and humor win and some arrogant or lecture-off-topic complaints.

Format shift

In-person teaching is stronger; online teaching clarity is weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and participation drive grades more than traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

and discussion; online similar with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and discussion-based with strong fans and a minority who find him arrogant or unclear.

Main concern

and heavy paper load frustrate some students.

What students said

“Awesome professor! His class is very fun and he's hilarious.”
ENG101
“Horrible professor! and he is very arrogant.”
ENG101
“ and show up to class and it is an easy A.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online English draws mixed-to-negative marks on teaching clarity, AI focus, and .

Main concern

No lectures and .

What students said

“This professor is obsessed with AI and technology focusing on students using it. I felt like he did not want to teach or . at all.”
ENGL101
“I but and sound criteria for grading”
ENGL205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk is paper volume and participation, not strict proctored exams; pop quizzes appear but .

Few Traditional TestsPapers and Weekly HWParticipation BasedPop Quizzes Sometimes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with occasional pop quizzes and few traditional tests.

So Many PapersParticipation MattersPop QuizzesTests Not Many
“There were a lot of 2-4 page assignments and 3 larger 6-8 page assignments”
ENG205
“Tests? Not many”
C0S124

Online

Online notes focus on readings, participation, and .

Online Synchronous ParticipationReading HeavyLimited Feedback
“Online synchronous class. Participation is key.”
ENGL205
“ at all.”
ENGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the ! Such a fun class where you learn a lot & it is very easy to stay focused!”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting humor, heavy writing, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

😂 Classroom Energy

75/100

“he's hilarious and got funny jokes.”

📚 Paper and Reading Load

32/100

“Way too much work for an ENGL 205 class.”

⚖️

40/100

“ and he is very arrogant.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's energetic and appreciates participation
  • strays off-topic not really addressing parts of the assignments
  • Great teacher! Very aware of current topics and the social climate.

Theme 2

📝

  • So many papers
  • Read, read and read... ... Participate
  • weekly HW (if you do all of them its a ez pass )

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he relates to students and speaks straight up, mad funny and easy going
  • Dustin is a great person, but as teacher is not as good.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

24 reviews from 2015-2024 with and repeated themes on humor, papers, and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1018 reviews
ENG2056 reviews
ENG493 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
Show 3 more courses
C0S1241 review
ENGLISH2051 review
ENGLISH491 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1