AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Najah Abdelkader

PHIL102A · PHIL102 · HUMA101 · HUM101 · PHIL100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a ; be cautious with older-style HUM lecture sections.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring but disorganizedEasy A in PHILMixed HUM lecturesParticipation mattersClear grading when organized
  • Recent PHIL students praise her as caring, engaging, and an easy A with light work.
  • Older HUM101 reviews slam and .
  • Online sections feel simpler and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Most graded reviews report A or A+ with comments calling PHIL and online HUM a super easy A if you complete posts and quizzes.

Online reviews emphasize retakeable chapter tests and easy As; in-person PHIL is still easy but older .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is GenEd philosophy and humanities with reading and discussion; most call it simple, though a and heavy.

Online comments stress simple material; than concept difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Many reviews mark attendance as mandatory or warn you will not pass if , though as not required.

Online is mixed with ; as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About two-thirds would take again, with glowing PHIL .

Online reviewers are mostly positive; and HUM critics.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students frequently call her an easy grader with , though a .

Format shift

Online lean more lenient and retake-friendly; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

PHIL often has light work, but , and reading that can pile up.

Format shift

Online notes lots of posts and Cengage work; .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

, and passionate, but organization and lecture clarity are inconsistent especially in HUM.

Format shift

Online students praise engagement and feedback; in-person quality swings by course era.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests rather than one single mode.

Format shift

Online leans toward chapter tests and posts; in-person HUM is described as more test and lecture heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL is often warm and rewarding, while several HUM101 reviews call lectures boring, scattered, and .

Main concern

HUM sections may feel unorganized with .

What students said

“I came back to rate her because she was the .”
PHIL102
“Her lectures are boring, and confusing. .”
HUM101
“most of or even her lectures.”
HUMA101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online PHIL and HUM sections are described as simple, retakeable quizzes or , and if you follow the schedule.

Main concern

Instructions and .

What students said

“Super easy A, don't understand the hate. love her”
HUM101
“Class was simple enough. Found the material particularly engaging though some of the instructions and online setup was a .”
PHIL102
“to do well is simple if you read the material and follow the schedule for ”
PHIL102A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

to in-person tests some students say do not match lectures.

Chapter testsCengage quizzesDiscussion postsTest heavy HUM sections

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mismatched tests more than open-book friendliness.

Test heavyLecture heavyParticipation matters
“most of or even her lectures.”
HUMA101
“Her class is all over the place and .”
HUM101

Online

Online work often uses Cengage or chapter tests, discussions, and a .

Cengage testsRetakeable chapter testsDiscussion postsShort essays
“you had to do 10 Chapter test (10pts), but they are extremely easy and can be done again and again until right.”
HUM101
“ ”
PHIL102A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I came back to rate her because she was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews spanning online and in-person PHIL and HUM courses. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Great professor, very caring and passionate about philosophy.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ .”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

80/100

“Super easy A, don't understand the hate. love her”

📚 Organization Risk

40/100

“Her class is all over the place and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very caring and passionate about philosophy
  • so far, super fun class.
  • Her lectures are boring, and confusing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy A, don't understand the hate.
  • Not a heavy workload, and generally an .
  • GOOD LUCK TAKING HER CLASS.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and will fix any issues
  • Najah is hilarious, super sweet lady
  • She cares about her students and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews from 2018-2024 with detailed comments, but opinions split by course and era so consistency is only moderate.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HUM1014 reviews
PHIL1024 reviews
PHIL102A4 reviews
HUMA1011 review
PHIL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values