AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Yanli Wang

CHEM200 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless required; because lecture clarity is widely questioned.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads from textbookIncorrect slidesUnclear explanationsTough graderPolarized reviews
  • Reviews split between great teaching praise and harsh criticism of clarity.
  • , and unhelpful labs.
  • Only five reviews, many old, so the picture is incomplete and mixed.
  • suitableStudentType is Self Taught Pro if you must take CHEM200.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tough-grader tags, high difficulty ratings, and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students , and lectures that make easy ideas feel harder.

All five reviews are in person CHEM200.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, and older reviews do not say.

Only in-person evidence; mixed or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Two strong positives and three strong negatives leave recommendation highly student-dependent.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tough-grader tags and reports of .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and lecture-heavy tags .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Praise exists, but multiple detailed , and reading from the text.

Format shift

In-person only; opinions are split 2 positive vs 3 negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Exams and single dominant method.

Format shift

In-person only; exam and lab issues both appear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person CHEM200: some call her prepared and great at teaching, others say she reads the , and grades poorly.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“This is professor is so bad. She always read off the textbook and never taught in a .”
CHEM200
“ . . Terrible at explaining chemistry concepts.”
CHEM200
“She is a great teacher. Always prepared and ready to answer questions.”
CHEM200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and labs but do not prove proctoring tools; .

In-person examsPoints adjusted on examsLab component

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person exams and labs are referenced; and removed randomly on exams.

Exam point adjustmentsLabNo proctoring software mentioned
“Screwed up the and grading system for the whole class by adding and .”
CHEM200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . Terrible at explaining chemistry concepts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2010-2024, highlighting mixed teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Lecture Clarity

38/100

“She always read off the textbook and never taught in a .”

⚠️ Slide Accuracy

30/100

“ .”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

70/100

“She is a great teacher. Always prepared and ready to answer questions.”

🧪 Lab Support

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always read off the textbook
  • Amazing lectures
  • Powerpoint

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • adding and
  • Did well anyway

Theme 3

❤️ About Approachability

  • Not personable or easily approachable
  • Always prepared and ready to answer questions
  • never cared about the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, three from 2010-2011, with polarized opinions and sparse grade data lower reliability.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM2005 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values