AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ashley Tamura

CHEM152 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Evidence is too thin and split to count on; succeed only if her in-class problems and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExam HeavyExtra CreditPolarized ReviewsClear SlidesSelf Teach Risk
  • Only two recent in-person reviews paint opposite pictures of the same chemistry teaching style
  • One student found exams fair with abundant slides, practice, and
  • Another felt problems were assigned with little intro and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One review reports an easy A with ; the other failed after self-teaching, so effort and fit matter more than a free A.

All evidence is in person; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings swing from 1 to 5, suggesting content is manageable only when teaching style clicks.

Only in-person reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

Only in-person evidence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One enthusiastic yes and one failure story leave recommendation at a coin flip.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and , but the F review implies grading will not save you without learning the material.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Exam-focused class with in-class problems and slides; not described as homework-heavy.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Amazing lectures and and incomplete answer review for another.

Format shift

Tiny in-person sample only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and in-class problems aligning to tests.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one easy path with exams and .

Main concern

Problem-first teaching may leave students teaching themselves if .

What students said

“Class is heavy on exams, but the resources given are more than enough to get a good grade. was always offered”
Chem-152
“We often worked on problems in class with little introduction to the subject and were expected to solve them on our first try.”
54579

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams dominate grading and track lecture slides and in-class problems, with .

Exam HeavyExtra CreditIn-Class ProblemsSlide Aligned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person chemistry is described as and class problems plus occasional extra points.

Exam HeavyExtra Credit on ExamsProblems Match Exams
“Class is heavy on exams, but the resources given are more than enough to get a good grade. was always offered and .”
Chem-152
“Everything she covers in class is on the as the slides provided”
Chem-152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is heavy on exams, but the resources given are more than enough to get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews only; sample is too small for high confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Resource Alignment

70/100

“Everything she covers in class is on the as the slides provided”

⚠️ Teaching Gap

30/100

“I ended up trying to Chemistry at home and failing to do so.”

🎯 Recommendation

50/100

“Many people did not learn the material this way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • worked on problems in class with little introduction
  • only sometimes went over the answers in detail

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • was always offered
  • Class is heavy on exams
  • failing to do so

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews from the same month cannot establish a stable pattern of teaching quality or grading.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

545791 review
Chem-1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values