AI Rate Professor

English

Aja Booker

ENGL101X · ENGL101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

and , but know some sections lean heavily into social-justice themes.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGives Great FeedbackClear SyllabusInspirationalPolitically Charged ContentRespected
  • Three of four students give her a 5 and , and .
  • One online student felt the class was political social-justice content instead of writing instruction.
  • Workload is generally light-to-moderate with and no required textbooks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Reported grades include A, A+, B+, and B-, and multiple students call the class easy or fair with .

Online reviews more often call the class easy; the in-person review reports higher difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Average difficulty is low-to-moderate and comments emphasize approachable structure more than dense theory.

Online sections read easier than the one in-person report.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

as not mandatory while others and the as mandatory.

Online evidence is mixed; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and care, tempered by one strongly negative content complaint.

Positive recommendations dominate online and in person; the politics critique is online only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students mention , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Assignments center on reading and writing responses without textbook load; one student found themes repetitive rather than heavy.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize ease; and higher difficulty.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Clear syllabus, fast responses, inspirational tone, and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more detailed; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize essays, readings, and .

Format shift

Assignment focus is clearest online; in-person also highlights writing techniques.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The helps students learn writing techniques like show don't tell.

Main concern

Higher perceived difficulty than some online sections.

What students said

“Aja is a great professor. She really cares to help us learn new writing techniques and the show, don't tell strategy is very unique!”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students mostly love her clarity, speed of , and , though one strongly disliked repetitive BLM/politics-focused assignments.

Main concern

Content can feel more political or social-justice heavy than pure writing skill building.

What students said

“I don't feel like this was an English class but instead a Social injustice/BLM/mass incarceration class.”
ENGL101X
“This was one of ! and she really does care and it shows.”
ENGL101
“ , and all encompassing in terms of the class.”
ENGL101X

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize writing assignments and exams.

Assignment FocusedNo Textbook

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review focuses on writing techniques and .

Writing Techniques Focus
“She really cares to help us learn new writing techniques”
ENGL101

Online

and do not clearly prove webcam proctoring or Lockdown Browser.

Assignment FocusedClear Grading Criteria
“grades fairly with a ”
ENGL101X
“ BLM suffering”
ENGL101X

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not be fooled by the lack of ratings, Aja Booker is a phenomenal professor; , and all encompassing in terms of the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in and content-focus disagreement. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟

88/100

“ and .”

📋 Course Clarity

90/100

“ , and all encompassing in terms of the class.”

⚠️ Content Focus Debate

35/100

“I learned nothing about writing whatsoever, every assignment was reading or writing about slavery or BLM suffering.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and she really does care
  • phenomenal professor
  • show, don't tell strategy is very unique

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very nice and easy class
  • grades fairly with a
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Content

  • Social injustice/BLM/mass incarceration class
  • She pushed politics and it was unprofessional

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed recent reviews give usable signal, but the sample is small and one strong outlier reduces consistency.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL1012 reviews
ENGL101X2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values