AI Rate Professor

English

Elaina Taylor

ENG049 · ENG205 · ENG101 · ENG49 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you want a hard, high-stress English section with and heavy workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderConfusing DeadlinesHeavy WorkloadPolitical ClassroomUnclear Instructions
  • Average quality near 1.8 with
  • Students say she announces she does not give As and grades harshly
  • Deadlines and and chaotic

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Multiple students say she states she does not give As and marks work incomplete for small mistakes.

Both online and ; in-person adds harsh incomplete marking.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

, and high difficulty ratings make content and pacing brutal.

In-person emphasizes group work and compressed deadlines; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews list attendance as .

In-person mostly mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Vast majority , and a hostile classroom.

One positive online ENG205 review is an .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and stated refusal to give As as harsh.

Format shift

Harsh tone appears in both formats; in-person details incomplete marks and .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Lots of , and weekend assignment dumps stack up.

Format shift

Online still has many assignments; in-person stresses compressed summer loads and .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

A few note interesting discussion style, but , and hostility.

Format shift

One strong online praise for feedback; in-person majority describes confusion and poor communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on frequent papers, reading responses, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English sections are widely described as , and hostile for many students.

Main concern

, and classroom hostility.

What students said

“ and everyone to run from this classroom”
ENG101
“Any as incomplete and wont give credit”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and care in ENG205; another calls her a zero for harsh grades and politics in ENG101.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ , and ”
ENG205
“She starts the semester by saying, "I don't give A's" and genuinely enjoys giving bad grades”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and chaotic due dates rather than friendly open-book exams.

Harsh Paper GradingHeavy PapersConfusing Deadlines

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments are paper-heavy with harsh incomplete marks and .

SO MANY PAPERSHarsh Incomplete MarksConfusing Due Dates
“Any as incomplete and wont give credit”
ENG205
“Do not come in the course expecting an easy "A"”
ENG101

Online

Online comments focus on assignment load and .

Heavy AssignmentsHarsh Grading
“She starts the semester by saying, "I don't give A's" and genuinely enjoys giving bad grades”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and everyone to run from this classroom- this is not the environment you want to be in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews with two online and and chaos. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

15/100

“ and everyone to run from this classroom- this is not the environment you want to be in.”

🅰️ No Easy A

12/100

“She started off In the syllabus by saying she doesn't give A's which already became very discouraging.”

📅 Deadline Chaos

20/100

“She posts work on Tuesday and its due by Thursday. Then on Thursday she posts work thats due on Sunday.”

📝 Teaching Clarity

22/100

“There are , and no clarity for questions asked.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Seems more interested in pushing her political views then teaching
  • she's completely clueless and oblivious as to what she's doing
  • No communication whatsoever

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she doesn't give A's
  • grades very harshly
  • Do not come in the course expecting an easy "A"

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • SO MANY PAPERS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews over many years show consistent low quality, high difficulty, and strongly negative themes.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENG2052 reviews
ENG492 reviews
631581 review
ENG0491 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2