AI Rate Professor

Legal Assisting

Ramisi Sukumu

LEGL100B · LEGL100A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid if you need engaging lectures and fair transparent testing; only consider if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesTrick Test QuestionsSlow Canvas FeedbackTest HeavyLow Teaching Energy
  • Students criticize dull monotone delivery and low teaching energy.
  • and an .
  • Slow Canvas responses leave students unsure of their standing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students still earn high grades, but trick questions and As feel unreliable.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is introductory legal assisting, but poor delivery and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

, and recent comments urge frustration over teaching quality.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Unfavorable test scales and synonym-based trick .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is reading and test heavy rather than massive projects, but .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students describe monotone, disengaged lectures with little help understanding fundamentals.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; one older review is positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments emphasize test-heavy assessment with online tests and harsh scoring.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and delayed grading, with one older positive outlier.

Main concern

Monotone delivery, trick questions, and .

What students said

“Lectures are monotonous, lackluster delivery, & painfully dull.”
LEGL100A
“ .”
LEGL100B
“It is painful to listen to her lectures.”
LEGL100A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and unfavorable scoring that frustrates students.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsTrue/False Synonym TrapsUnfavorable Grading Scale

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report online-style tests packed with trick true/false items and an .

Trick QuestionsTrue/False TrapsTest Heavy
“ .”
LEGL100B
“ .”
LEGL100A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Lots of true/false questions with synonyms used which, in her eyes, made the question incorrect.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting delivery and testing complaints. Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Dull Delivery

28/100

“Lectures are monotonous, lackluster delivery, & painfully dull.”

🪤 Trick Testing

32/100

“ .”

🐢

35/100

“Communication on Canvas is delayed, taking weeks for ”

🚫

18/100

“She is an absolute mess of a teacher who shows no enthusiasm towards teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • painfully dull
  • monotone with "kinda sorta" being the extent of her description of the law
  • Ramisi is a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈

  • I prefer a teacher who wants to test your understating of the subject matter

Theme 3

📡 About Communication

  • Communication on Canvas is delayed, taking weeks for
  • Leaving students uncertain about their current standing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews over many years with mixed ages and limited grade detail lower confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LEGL100A3 reviews
LEGL100B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values