AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jessica Woods

CHEM100L · CHEM200L · 100L · CHEM100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
18.75%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you already know the material and can self-teach around unclear videos and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear LecturesHeavy WorkloadSlow GradingAvoid For Core Chem
  • Most students report and little learning in CHEM100 lecture.
  • , and .
  • and more doable than lecture.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earn As , but many report tough grading, C grades after heavy effort, and drops.

Online comments stress tough grading and drops; a As with full participation.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is treated as hard with , and tests that students say do not match lectures.

Both formats call CHEM lecture hard; and testing-center logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory and .

A couple of , but the dominant pattern is mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most comments urge students to pick literally any other professor.

Online and ; isolated lab positives do not flip the overall advice.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

and C or drop outcomes after heavy study dominate over a .

Format shift

Online CHEM100 is harshest; Chem200L in person is described as easier if you complete everything.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Long lecture videos, lots of reading, quizzes per topic, notes, and .

Format shift

Online students stress long videos and late bulk testing; in and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Students repeatedly say explanations are poor, questions are discouraged, and they learn little from her teaching.

Format shift

Online and ; but still not a rescue.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, with several notes of test-heavy pressure.

Format shift

Online mentions testing center and stacked finals week assessments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person lecture reviews warn of GPA damage and fast pacing, while a and fairer points for participation.

Main concern

and last-minute, with little help when questions arise.

What students said

“ . She will ruin your gpa”
CHEM100
“ as long as you participate in class and do everything you need to do.”
Chem200L
“She teaches fast, only cares about sticking to her schedule”
CHEM100

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHEM100 and , unhelpful office hours, belittling tone, and chaotic quiz or exam timing.

Main concern

Little support when stuck and lectures .

What students said

“U will learn absolutely nothing with her teaching style.”
CHEM100
“Her lectures the math is usually off, so be wary. Lectures and ”
CHEM100
“ .”
100L

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix quizzes, exams, and labs; friendliness is limited by timing chaos and mismatch with .

QuizzesTesting CenterStacked Finals WeekLab Quizzes With Report

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals the same week and lab quizzes that can use the lab report as reference.

Same-Week Exam And FinalLab Quizzes Open To Lab Report
“exam and the day of”
CHEM100
“ , but you can use your lab report (due that day) for reference.”
CHEM100L

Online

Online reviews mention testing-center appointments and finals week pileups of quizzes and .

Testing CenterMultiple Exams In Finals WeekLecture-Test Mismatch
“Making appointments at the testing center was annoying, but that wasn't her fault.”
CHEM100
“Kept putting off posting quizzes/tests which led to us taking the final as well as 4 other .”
CHEM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save your mental and save your education by enrolling with literally any other professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (10 online, 6 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“U're better off having ur dog teach u chemistry.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“Whatever you do. DO NOT! enroll with this professor.”

📚 Workload Pressure

26/100

“she'll upload 9 vids over 20 min long per lecture.”

⚖️

24/100

“She will ruin your gpa”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes not good @ explaining the material.
  • she feels her online youtube lectures are self-explanatory and will flat out tell you to get a tutor
  • the lecture videos (class was

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy A - learned nothing.
  • She will make you suffer just for a "C".
  • More than half of our quizzes and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support And Tone

  • she will belittle you if you don't understand a concept
  • She would say I don't care you should have read the syllabus
  • When peers complained she threatened to make the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years, both formats, and consistent negative lecture themes give a solid signal despite a .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CHEM1008 reviews
438793 reviews
100L2 reviews
CHEM100L2 reviews
Chem200L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1