AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Donald Gould

ART161 · ARTG100 · ARTG118 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can; online sections are more uneven, so check the course design before enrolling.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong In-Person MentorGood FeedbackExtra CreditHit-Or-Miss OnlineIndustry Relevant
  • as fun, relevant, and supportive.
  • Online ARTG118 is mixed, with some calling it boring or mostly linked videos.
  • Grades trend and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are As with and helpful feedback making success reachable with normal effort.

Both online and in-person As appear; negatives focus on .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though some projects and tests still require steady work.

In person feels engaging; online is called boring more than intellectually brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others mark it mandatory, so policy is not uniform.

Online ARTG118 often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About three in by avoid-this-professor online comments.

; online reviews pull the average down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

High A rates plus extra credit and .

Format shift

One online review calls him a , but reported grades stay high.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Multiple assignments and .

Format shift

Online tags include test heavy; in person emphasizes projects and .

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

In-person teaching is described as excellent and industry-aware; online delivery quality is inconsistent.

Format shift

In person drives the positive score; and not-really-teaching complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests all appear, with neither pure homework nor pure exams dominating.

Format shift

Online comments mention tests more; in person centers on projects and guest-speaker .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students highlight industry-relevant lectures, guest speakers, accessibility, and .

Main concern

, so plan to ask questions and .

What students said

“His lectures were industry relevant and informative but also fun”
ART161
“The and genuinely wants to help you through the course so that you'll pass.”
ARTG100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ARTG118 splits between excellent support and complaints of , and .

Main concern

Quality depends on whether the section feels taught or outsourced to third-party videos.

What students said

“Literally the most boring class I've taken so far, the professor isn't even teaching they just linked a bunch of videos done by other people to watch.”
ARTG118
“Excellent professor that really sets you up to succeed, even if art is not your thing.”
ARTG118
“ fun and life out of graphic design.”
ARTG118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not describe strict proctoring software.

Project BasedTests MentionedExtra Credit Lectures

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment centers on assignments, feedback, and rules.

ProjectsGuest Speaker Extra Credit
“he would offer to people that attended those lectures”
ART161
“There are many assignments some more challenging than others, but by asking questions and .”
ARTG100

Online

Online ARTG118 is tagged test heavy by some, but no webcam or Lockdown details are given.

Test Heavy TagsUnclear Instructions
“ and never accessible outside of class.”
ARTG118

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can't say enough good things about this professor. His lectures were industry relevant and informative but also fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in person), highlighting format split and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“His lectures were industry relevant and informative but also fun”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“ satisfy those credits.”

📝

78/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just linked a bunch of videos done by other people to watch
  • lectures were industry relevant and informative but also fun
  • fun and life out of graphic design.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • and genuinely wants to help
  • and flexible.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Work

  • Excellent professor that really sets you up to succeed
  • The but
  • by asking questions and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews across years give a , but the sample is still small for firm certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARTG1183 reviews
ART1611 review
ARTG1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1