AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Gay Olivier-Lilley

CHEM152 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you need clear lectures; only consider if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesUnorganized teachingTest heavySelf-study requiredLab-linked content gaps
  • Single review rates quality low and difficulty high for Chem152.
  • Lectures feel boring and unorganized, so students learn most material outside class.
  • Study guides are unhelpful and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

High difficulty and A takes substantial outside effort.

All evidence is from one In person Chem152 review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is hard enough that and study guides fall short.

Only In .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and lecture is central even if quality is poor.

Based solely on the In person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The only review would not endorse the teaching quality despite calling her a .

Recommendation signal comes only from In person evidence; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but weak study guides and test focus make grades feel unsupported rather than generous.

Format shift

Single In person review; grade outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Tags highlight lecture-heavy and test-heavy work plus outside .

Format shift

Only In person comments available.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Student says lectures are boring and unorganized and study guides do not help, forcing outside learning.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is In person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments emphasize lecture and tests more than assignment-driven assessment.

Format shift

In person only; no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One Chem152 review describes unorganized boring lectures, weak study guides, test-heavy structure, and disadvantage if .

Main concern

You may need to learn most material outside class and miss topics not covered for her lab students.

What students said

“Professor Gay is a nice person but her lectures are boring and unorganized. Her .”
Chem152
“You will most likely have to learn most material outside of class.”
Chem152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course is framed as risk for students who need lecture support.

Test heavyUnhelpful study guidesLecture-linked exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person Chem152 is described as and material often learned outside class.

Test heavyUnhelpful study guides
“Her . You will most likely have to learn most material outside of class.”
Chem152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gay is a nice person but her lectures are boring and unorganized. Her .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

😴 Lecture Quality Issues

25/100

“her lectures are boring and unorganized.”

📘 Weak Study Support

30/100

“Her .”

🧪

28/100

“If you have a disadvantage as she will only teach what her lab students need, which includes skipping topics.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are boring and unorganized
  • You will most likely have to learn most material outside of class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Test heavy
  • Get ready to read
  • Lecture heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2023 review exists, so scores rest on a single detailed but unverified student experience.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Chem1521 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1