AI Rate Professor

English

Carrie Gordh

ENGLISH101 · ENGLISH47A · ENG41028 · ENG205 · AH101 · ENG101X · ENGL47A · ENG47A · ENG49 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGL205 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
65.38%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a caring writing coach and and progressive topics; online sections look riskier.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorGives strong paper feedbackPolitically heavy topicsDisorganized at timesLots of papers
  • , and writing growth with revision chances.
  • Critics flag disorganization, last-minute emails, and heavy political or social-justice framing.
  • Online reviews are sparse and much .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many As appear, and revisions help, but she is often a and .

Online reviews are more negative on organization; most grade .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Course content is college writing level with and .

; online students say little real English is taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and stress participation, though a few note understanding for absences.

Attendance comments are mostly from in-person sections; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and writing growth despite organization complaints.

In-person recommendations are strong; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Often tagged tough grader, but , and fair final outcomes.

Format shift

Online critics focus more .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of papers, reading, journals, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work; online also complains about chaotic due dates.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most detailed reviews praise passion, care, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally strong; online evidence is sparse and poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation rather than traditional proctored exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often described as caring, inspirational, and , though some still call her unorganized or too political.

Main concern

and papers plus strong political framing may frustrate some students.

What students said

“She's such an amazing, dedicated and understanding professor.”
ENG101
“I love, love, LOVE her so much!! She's a but don't worry because she gives you time to revise!”
ENG205
“ ”
ENG41028

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The two online reviews call the course disorganized, political, and light on real English instruction.

Main concern

, and little clear writing instruction.

What students said

“ and political. Awful due dates.”
ENG101
“Very little English is taught here. Rambling social justice soapbox.”
ENG101X

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and projects with revision chances; .

Paper heavyRevisions allowedFew traditional exams mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but revision opportunities.

So many papersRevisions allowedParticipation matters
“She's a but don't worry because she gives you time to revise!”
ENG205
“More Racial Ethics than English. Very .”
ENG41028

Online

Online comments emphasize modules and .

Assignment modulesUnclear criteria
“Incredibly unorganized hardly ever uploads the correct modules to turn in assignments.”
ENG101X

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's such an amazing, dedicated and understanding professor. and is always open to helping you with your paper.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (2 online, 25 in , and organization tensions. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

74/100

“Professor Carrie is a wonderful, intelligent person who knows how to write and teach”

✍️

80/100

“Will tell you EVERYTHING that can . Seems harsh but pays off in the end.”

🗂️ Organization Risk

40/100

“Simply terrible and disorganized. ”

👍 Recommendation Level

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's passionate about what she does
  • amazing lectures that you will surely learn from
  • She facilitates a space where students feel encouraged to be themselves

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's a but don't worry because she gives you time to revise!
  • The work may feel like too much but she checks in with you
  • Her class is not "easy" because there is homework but you will see improvement

Theme 3

⚠️ About Politics & Organization

  • Rambling social justice soapbox
  • Wont enjoy if Conservative

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews with a long time span and detailed comments; online sample is only two so format splits are less certain.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG2055 reviews
ENGL47A5 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
ENGL1014 reviews
ENG101X2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
AH1011 review
ENG410281 review
ENG47A1 review
ENG491 review
ENGL2051 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH47A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2