AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katherine Naimark

MATH58243 · MATH46 · MATH96 · MATH096 · MATH116 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH38 · MATH104 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you will stay on top of and homework; she rewards effort but moves fast and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and passionateTest heavyClear lecturesLots of homeworkRetakes and drops
  • Most students , and passion for math.
  • Courses are test-heavy with frequent quizzes and .
  • , and drops help motivated students succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are reachable if and , but exams are frequent and can be graded strictly.

; in-person reviews emphasize recovery options and putting the work in.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from supportive intro math to fast, focus-heavy courses with frequent testing.

Both formats report moderate-to-high difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and note that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

; online evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, despite workload and pace complaints.

In-person recommendations dominate; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some call her an and drops; and little slack.

Format shift

Online comments lean tougher on exams; in-person comments more often mention second chances.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly quizzes, online homework, and steady heavy load.

Format shift

Both formats mention weekly quizzes and homework; .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and the best math teacher they have had, with a minority finding lectures fast or .

Format shift

In-person praise for clarity and passion is strongest; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades lean heavily on frequent quizzes and biweekly or .

Format shift

Online and and several major exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is widely described as caring and , and multiple ways to raise grades, though some call the pace exhausting and test-heavy.

Main concern

Fast lectures, long class blocks, and frequent exams can overwhelm students who fall behind.

What students said

“Best math teacher + class I've ever had! Her lectures are so clear and ”
MATH151
“If you put the work in you will get a good grade in her class.”
MATH104
“she moves way too fast. The class is 3 hours long which I wish I would've known.”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student earned an A with and heavy weekly quizzes and regretted the class.

Main concern

and heavy weekly quiz load.

What students said

“She is a , as she will deduct points for the smallest mistakes”
MATH151
“I took the 8 week course, and passed with an A! I have never passed math with an A before.”
MATH38

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams come often and matter a lot, but practice materials, formula sheets, and .

Frequent examsWeekly quizzesFormula sheetsPractice exams similar to testsExam retakes or drops

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams often match study guides, allow formula sheets, and .

Study-guide style examsFormula sheetsDrops lowest examExam retakesWeekly quizzes
“ . .”
MATH116
“lets us use great formula sheets”
MATH151

Online

Online reviews describe multiple exams plus weekly quizzes with harsh small-mistake deductions and limited recovery detail.

Multiple examsWeekly quizzesHarsh exam gradingExtra creditDrop lowest quizzes
“4 exams overall, one homework and . Offers EC and will drop 2 lowest quizzes.”
MATH151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Naimark made me enjoy a math class for the first time in my life. If you put the work in you will get a good grade in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting care, testing load, and grade recovery. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Best math teacher + class I've ever had! Her lectures are so clear and ”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“She also has exams every 2 weeks and entire semester.”

👍

72/100

“ . I'll make your choice very simple. She is the .”

⚖️

52/100

“She is a , as she will deduct points for the smallest mistakes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and excitement
  • and is more then willing to talk through concepts
  • she moves way too fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you put the work in you will get a good grade in her class.
  • . .
  • weekly quizzes and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • She is so sweet and knowledgeable
  • , and tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed reviews spanning 2015-2023 with consistent themes on care, workload, and testing support solid credibility.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1044 reviews
MATH1162 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
MATH382 reviews
MATH962 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH0961 review
MATH1501 review
MATH461 review
MATH582431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2