AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sue Martin

CHLD101 · CD111 · CHILDDEVART · CD151 · CHILDDEV111 · CD121ART · CD141 · CHIL265P · CD · CHIL101 · CD101 · CHILD101 · CD180 · CHIL141 · MUSICCD · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid her if you want engaging instruction; only take her if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderDoes not teachHeavy reading and papersExtra credit dependentBoring lectures
  • Many students say she reads the book or shows old videos instead of teaching.
  • for a CD course.
  • Workload is high with lots of reading, papers, and almost-required .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some older comments call it an easy A with , but recent and As hard without grinding.

Online evidence is strongly negative on bias; in-person evidence is mixed but leans hard for a high grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is often book-driven rather than and papers keep the course demanding.

In-person reviews dominate and stress boring but work-heavy delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and tag skip class and you will not pass.

; the online review marks attendance not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and many comments .

; online has only one strongly negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate, with reports of biased posts, harsh papers, and needed for a B or A.

Format shift

Online and recent in-person reviews .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Students report lots of , and service or supply tasks.

Format shift

Heavy workload themes appear in both formats, especially papers and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Frequent claims that she does not teach, only reads the book or plays old videos, outweigh the minority who value her experience.

Format shift

; the online review focuses on bias and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and nearly required .

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussion posts; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person she is frequently called boring, strict, and non-teaching, with and tough grading, though a minority praise her field knowledge and .

Main concern

, and a classroom style many experience as rude or disengaged.

What students said

“She doesn't teach at all, everything you do she gives you a zero or a very terrible score.”
CD151
“Going to class is a waste of time. She is VERY disrespectful to students so beware.”
CHIL101
“You would definitely have to do just to get a "B" grade.”
CD141

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review calls her biased, a , and .

Main concern

date and grades feel opinion-based.

What students said

“She will give you a grade based on how much she agrees with your post or not. Terrible! Plus she locks all the it's due.”
CHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often book-based and described as hard, poorly worded, or unidentifiable, with used to rescue grades.

Book-based examsHard or unclear questionsExtra credit dependentNo drops reported oftenHeavy paper load

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but many call questions hard or unclear and say is almost required.

Book page examsUnclear wordingExtra credit neededMany papersNo electronics sometimes
“The questions on the . She is a .”
CD141
“she will give zero leeway and impossibly worded.”
CD101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove proctoring details and and late-unlocked work.

Discussion post gradingLate-unlocked assignmentsTough grader
“She will give you a grade based on how much she agrees with your post or not.”
CHIL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, , and heavy work. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She does NOT teach, & does NOT let you use your brain or outside (respected) sources for reasoning”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ !!!!”

⚖️

24/100

“She is a . You would definitely have to do just to get a "B" grade.”

📚 Heavy Workload

26/100

“This class had more work than any other I've taken in 6 full time semesters!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she literally just tells you what pages to read
  • Reads straight from the book during class or puts in a VHS from 1985
  • She is extremely boring and shes does not teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and also very biased on her grades
  • You also
  • Gives a lot of but I aced the class

Theme 3

⚠️ Classroom Climate

  • She is VERY disrespectful to students so beware
  • she can be snappy if you ask too many questions
  • She is a very cold woman

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one reviews over many years show a consistent negative majority on teaching and .

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 513
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHIL1017 reviews
CHIL1416 reviews
CD1015 reviews
CD1415 reviews
CD121ART3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
CD1112 reviews
CD1512 reviews
CHIL265P2 reviews
1011 review
1111 review
CD1 review
CD1801 review
CHILD1011 review
CHILDDEV1111 review
CHILDDEVART1 review
CHLD1011 review
MUSICCD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1