AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Gloria Lyon

CD275 · CHIL180 · CD160 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid unless you need her specifically for CDC mentoring and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnprofessionalHarsh feedbackPolarized mentorParticipation matters
  • Recent students report rude, hostile, and .
  • Older reviews praise her as a .
  • Work itself is not always hard, but feedback and grade disputes dominate the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Content can be manageable but , and limited grading items make an A unreliable hard work.

Online and ; older in-person mentor reviews say little about grade ease.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Students say the work is not always difficult, but , and strict instruction-following raise the bar.

Online comments stress reading and presentations; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and participation; several online reviews say attendance was not mandatory.

Online reviews ; some in-person and one online note participation or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

, and recent comments focus on rudeness and grading disputes.

Recent online and in-person reviews are strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated tough-grader tags, harsh comments, and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is usually described as manageable, not overwhelming, with reading and assignments rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Both formats describe manageable volume with strict quality expectations.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Recent students emphasize hostility and unprofessionalism; older field-mentoring praise does not outweigh current classroom complaints.

Format shift

Online reviews are almost entirely negative; in-person is polarized by decade.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grading centers on discussions, presentations, and assignments with few graded .

Format shift

Online comments especially mention discussion boards and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

recent CHIL180 calls her extremely rude with harsh comments, while older CDC-era reviews call her a fantastic mentor.

Main concern

Harsh written feedback and .

What students said

“Overall the work was not too difficult however she was an extremely rude and comments on my work.”
CHIL180
“Ms. Gloria is a fantastic professor and mentor. She is always willing to help students in any way possible.”
CD160

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe hostility over Canvas issues, misgraded work, no late work despite syllabus language, and .

Main concern

Unprofessional communication and .

What students said

“Was extremely unprofessional, when I was faced with an issue with Canvas glitching and not submitting my assignment I attempted to contact her was faced with hostility”
CD160
“Professor Gloria Lyn was very unprofessional ”
CHIL180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on assignments and , so .

Assignment heavyDiscussion boardsFinal presentation

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Assignment feedback focused
“Overall the work was not too difficult however she was an extremely rude and comments on my work.”
CHIL180

Online

Online reviews emphasize discussions, presentations, and .

Discussion boardsFinal presentationNo late work
“Followed exactly what she asked for and still gave me a bad grade”
CHIL180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall the work was not too difficult however she was an extremely rude and comments on my work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews spanning 2005-2023, balancing recent harsh classroom complaints against older mentor praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

😬 Professionalism Concerns

22/100

“Was extremely unprofessional, when I was faced with an issue with Canvas glitching and not submitting my assignment I attempted to contact her was faced with hostility”

📝

22/100

“ ”

🌟 Older Mentor Praise

85/100

“Ms. Gloria is a fantastic professor and mentor. She is always willing to help students in any way possible.”

Theme 1

😠 About Communication

  • faced with hostility and was accused of disrespecting her
  • and comments on my work
  • One comment stating You cited B.S notions

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • whatever I attempted to turn in was harshly graded

Theme 3

🤝 About Mentoring (older)

  • she helped me to feel as though I was making the right choice
  • always willing to help students in any way possible
  • provides valuable information in her child development classes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews span many years with detailed recent complaints but older glowing mentor notes, so signal is mixed but usable.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHIL1803 reviews
CD1602 reviews
CD2751 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1