AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Megan Bowles

CHEM152 · CHEM200 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Risky pick for chemistry unless and verify exam yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyHard to follow lecturesExam errorsFast paceLow exam averages
  • Only two reviews, both in person, paint lectures as .
  • Exams dominate outcomes and averages can be very low.
  • , so and external help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student earned an A, but and answer-key errors make high grades feel uncertain and hard-earned.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Fast lectures, concept gaps, and listed difficulty tags.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One student would take again despite weak lectures; the other implies a .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Partial credit after wrong official answers helps a bit, but .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews focus more on .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

issues, and repeated example or key mistakes.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Test-heavy tags and comments about exam averages and grade.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but weak at explaining, with , and exam key mistakes.

Main concern

Hard-to-follow lectures plus incorrect quiz or .

What students said

“Her lectures can be , and she doesn't explain the concepts exceptionally well.”
chem200
“Even answers on the quizzes and .”
chem152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and often very hard, with reports of incorrect official answers and material that was said not to be tested.

Test heavyLow exam averagesQuiz and exam answer errorsPartial credit after corrections

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report test-heavy grading, exam averages around 50 percent, and frequent wrong answers on quizzes and exams.

Test heavyLow exam averagesWrong exam answersPartial credit
“ on the last exam being around a 50%.”
chem200
“Even answers on the quizzes and .”
chem152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and find you failed. You look up the answers and find she had several answers wrong and you were actually right.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews focused on lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

🧪 Lecture Clarity

28/100

“Her lectures can be , and she doesn't explain the concepts exceptionally well.”

📉

32/100

“Even answers on the quizzes and .”

📅

85/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Very nice but honestly not that great of a professor.
  • Goes very fast and has lots of mistakes in her example work.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams

  • on the last exam being around a 50%.
  • Sections she said wouldn't be on the test are.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent in-person reviews limit confidence despite consistent concerns about lectures and exams.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

chem1521 review
chem2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values