AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

C Evans

PHIL125 · PHIL205 · PHIL102A · PHILO100 · PHIL102 · PHIL · PHILS101 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILOSOPHY102B · PHILOSOPHY102A · PHIL102B · PHIL100 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Prefer her in-person philosophy sections if you will do the reading and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDiscussion DrivenClear ExplainerExtra Credit LiberalInteresting TopicsReading Required
  • Most in-person reviews praise engaging philosophy discussions and
  • Class is manageable if you read and complete work; not always an automatic A
  • One recent online review alleges unfair treatment versus in-person students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many say easy if you read and turn work in, with liberal , though a few call it not an easy A.

; the one online review signals less flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Intro philosophy is approachable when she simplifies concepts, but .

Nearly ; online sample is too thin on content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

and helps on finals, but policies are not described as harshly policed everywhere.

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most older in-person students highly recommend and one harsh online review.

In-person enthusiasm is high; the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and when students do the reading and assignments.

Format shift

Leniency claims are in-person; online student felt denied .

Workload

Light

68/100

, and projects rather than constant heavy drills.

Format shift

; online mentions papers then a sudden timed test.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students praise clarity, humor, discussion facilitation, and genuine care for understanding.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online experience is described as unfair and condescending.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment mixes reading, papers, projects, and .

Format shift

and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and discussion-friendly with interesting topics and fair workload.

Main concern

, and reading is required to succeed.

What students said

“Cassandra Evans is by far one of the . In was a true blessing to be in her class.”
PHIL102B
“It's philosophy so , but she does an excellent job of simplifying the material.”
PHILO100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The sole online review is strongly negative about unequal , condescending emails, and a .

Main concern

Perceived unfairness to online students and .

What students said

“She offers more help and to people who are taking the class in person and refuses to give extra credit to online students.”
PHILOSOPHY

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

students, with occasional clarity complaints.

Reading-Based TestsPapersProjectsExtra CreditTimed Test Change

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you read, though some call them long or unclear.

Reading-Based TestsPapersProjects
“ . Gives reasonable amount of homework”
PHILO100
“There's a good ammount of reading involved, and .”
PHIL125

Online

One online review says the a timed test.

Timed TestSyllabus Change During Finals
“Changed the week to be a timed test.”
PHILOSOPHY

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cassandra Evans is by far one of the . In was a true blessing to be in her class. She made the class fun and we learned so much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 mostly older in-person philosophy reviews plus one recent online critique. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Wow. Best professor ever. She's really helpful and . Makes sure you understand everything, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“enthusiastically recommend if !”

📖

67/100

“To pass her class you have to read the book. If you read the book the class will be a piece of cake.”

⚠️ Online Fairness Concern

30/100

“She offers more help and to people who are taking the class in person and refuses to give extra credit to online students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made the class fun and we learned so much
  • She teaches with a sense of humor, and keeps the class interested
  • she does an excellent job of simplifying the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class was easy.. very liberal with and grading
  • Class is not that and study for the tests
  • Definately not an easy A. There's a good ammount of reading involved

Theme 3

💬 About Class Atmosphere

  • that class felt like a family by the end
  • We discussed so many controversial issues and somehow it went by smoothly
  • Friendly and intelligent. Class is fun and humorous!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews exist but most are from 2005 to 2010, with only one recent online review, so current practice is less certain.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL102B9 reviews
PHIL2054 reviews
PHILOSOPHY4 reviews
PHIL102A3 reviews
PHIL1002 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PHIL1022 reviews
PHIL1 review
PHIL1251 review
PHILO1001 review
PHILOSOPHY102A1 review
PHILOSOPHY102B1 review
PHILS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values