AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Marc Biagi

CISC220 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want practical game-dev tools and can handle a packed short-term workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOnline SavvyClear Grading CriteriaLots of HomeworkResponsive FeedbackIntensive Short Format
  • Online game-programming style course with Unity and C# plus strong responsiveness
  • , but and an intensive short-term pace
  • and cut-and-paste prototype work

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A B+ with high difficulty and .

Evidence comes only from one online CISC220 review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty is high and the short format makes game programming and design concepts intensive.

Evidence comes only from one online CISC220 review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

as not mandatory.

Evidence comes only from one online CISC220 review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Despite intensity, the and praises responsiveness.

Evidence comes only from one online CISC220 review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but the earned grade and workload suggest no free A.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and intensive prototype development in a short term.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students highlight clear criteria, responsiveness, and .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Course centers on game prototype development and ongoing coding work more than formal exams.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online course with and C# focus, and a dense short-term project load.

Main concern

Eight-week intensity and .

What students said

“ and provided . Less Good: the game prototype development ended up being a lot of cut and paste of C# code, course was a bit intensive for the 8 week format.”
CISC220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize project and policy.

Project-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online evidence focuses on prototype coding and .

Project-Based AssessmentClear Grading Criteria
“the game prototype development ended up being a lot of cut and paste of C# code, course was a bit intensive for the 8 week format.”
CISC220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and provided . Less Good: the game prototype development ended up being a lot of cut and paste of C# code, course was a bit intensive for the 8 week format.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review, highlighting responsiveness and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and provided ”

💻 Course Tools

85/100

“Unity and C# were the primary tools; lots of Game Design concepts”

📚 Workload Intensity

30/100

“course was a bit intensive for the 8 week format”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Online Teaching

  • Online Savvy
  • and provided

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • Lots of homework
  • a lot of cut and paste of C# code
  • course was a bit intensive for the 8 week format

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence remains limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CISC2201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values