AI Rate Professor

Health Education

leannn Taylor

NUTR150 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you and discussion participation for a manageable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy Homework LoadParticipation MattersExtra Credit AvailableNice But OverwhelmingRepeatable Assignments
  • stacks of chapter work and .
  • Content itself is not described as intellectually brutal, and .
  • Experience splits hard between one overwhelmed student and one who found it easy with the book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is available if you buy access, participate, and re-do chapter work, but heavy volume can still land a C.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material is described as not hard, but the volume of questions and .

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Online format with attendance marked no or not emphasized; and .

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

; another says nope purely because of assignment overload.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Repeating assignments and help, but full .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Multiple stacked assignments, papers, and chapter work create a high time cost.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Seen as , but overloaded workload tanks overall experience for another.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Chapter assignments, papers, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Fully online nutrition with heavy chapter assignments, discussion participation, and .

Main concern

a short window and feels excessive.

What students said

“homegirl be dropping up to 10 assignments back to back.”
NUTR150
“you can repeat the assignments as many times as you want to get the A.”
NUTR150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment- and ; reviews do not prove webcam or lockdown policies.

Chapter AssignmentsDiscussion BoardsRepeatable WorkAccess Code Required

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online , and repeatable work; no clear proctoring policy stated.

Chapter AssignmentsDiscussion BoardsRepeatable WorkAccess Code Required
“Have to participate in the .”
NUTR150
“The and work.”
NUTR150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but homegirl be dropping up to 10 assignments back to back.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews, highlighting workload split and grade paths. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“will have u do 4 assignments each of those days which is too much.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ and .”

👍 Split Recommendation

45/100

“ ? nope but that doesn't mean she isn't a .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class is easy, you need the book and access code
  • you can repeat the assignments as many times as you want to get the A
  • The and work.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • dropping up to 10 assignments back to back

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • Participation matters
  • Have to participate in the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 online reviews with sharply split outcomes lower reliability despite concrete workload details.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR1502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values