AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Alana Hawkins

ARTG100 · ARTG125 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are a self-directed design major who can wait months for grades and teach yourself from old videos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow gradingDisengaged onlineRecycled videosProject-basedMixed feedback
  • Two ARTG100 reviews slam delayed grading and low involvement
  • One ARTG125 and Adobe skill growth
  • Experience appears course-dependent and mostly negative overall

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earn A/B grades but face tough comments and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is manageable Adobe and design work, but and .

Only online evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

; policies are inconsistent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Two of three reviews are strongly negative about teaching involvement and .

Recommendation split is entirely within online courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

; and grades arrive very late.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Assignments and projects are central; one review flags lots of homework.

Format shift

Workload comments are online only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students say she recycles another professor's videos and .

Format shift

One positive ARTG125 review contrasts with two poor ARTG100 experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Courses center on design projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are online; ARTG100 feels neglected with late grades, while ARTG125 students report and useful projects.

Main concern

and low teaching involvement in some sections.

What students said

“She doesn't grade anything until the course is over... Meaning you won't know how .”
ARTG100
“Hawkins doesnt teach; she just sends us videos that another professor made 5 years ago.”
ARTG100
“Really fun class and .”
ARTG125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe project and .

Project-basedAssignment feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online courses emphasize projects and ; .

Project-basedDelayed assignment feedback
“ very end of the semester.”
ARTG100
“The and understand the adobe programs quickly”
ARTG125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hawkins doesnt teach; she just sends us videos that another professor made 5 years ago.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online reviews only. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Involvement

32/100

“it didn't seem like Professor Hawkins was very... involved”

⏱️

25/100

“She takes 2 1/2 months to grade our work”

👍 Course-Dependent Praise

70/100

“I highly suggest taking her especially if you're a graphic design major!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just sends us videos that another professor made 5 years ago
  • Really fun class and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of
  • She doesn't grade anything until the course is over
  • A / B mixed results

Theme 3

⚠️

  • very end
  • goes straight to the negative
  • Clear grading criteria (positive ARTG125)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 online reviews from 2021-2022 with conflicting quality ratings and no in-person sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ARTG1002 reviews
ARTG1251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values