AI Rate Professor

Graphic Design

Julie Warren

CRN51647 · ART125 · ARTG144 · ARTG125 · DIGITALMEDIA · DIGMEDIA · DIGITMEDI · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.24%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Highly recommended intro graphic design pick if and real skill growth.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear TutorialsGreat FeedbackBeginner FriendlyExtra CreditCaring
  • and in-class .
  • , and keep grades fair and recoverable.
  • A few students found her sarcastic or strict, but most call her a standout GD instructor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Resubmits, , and an easy final quiz make strong grades very reachable with steady project work.

Online reviews stress resubmits and ; in-person also stresses EC and recovery options.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro digital media content is broken into clear steps, challenging mainly for brand-new software users.

; in-person and online both treat it as beginner-friendly Adobe work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; others mark no or optional.

Online often unstated or flexible via modules; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Overwhelming praise for teaching quality and beginner support with only a few harsh outliers.

Online and ; negatives are sparse in both.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Resubmission for , and keep grading student-friendly.

Format shift

Online explicitly mentions resubmits; in-person echoes EC and improvement chances, with .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

but are paced with and manageable weekly effort.

Format shift

Online says assignments are not too long; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and life-changing intro design teaching.

Format shift

Strong in both formats; online highlights video clarity and in-person highlights walk-around help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects and design work drive the grade, with a .

Format shift

; and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise 1-on-1 help, humor, and thorough Adobe instruction for beginners.

Main concern

A minority cite sarcasm or defensiveness when challenged on tools.

What students said

“By far, the .”
ARTG125
“She walks around the class to answer any questions and give 1 on 1 help.”
ARTG125
“Julie is very sarcastic.”
ART125

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online modules and , and easy to follow for Adobe tools.

Main concern

and image sourcing care.

What students said

“I really appreciate the specificity with which Prof Warren builds out her class and .”
ARTG125
“ .”
ARTG125
“multiple choice and fairly easy.”
ARTG125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is project-heavy with an and no strict proctoring mentioned.

Easy Final QuizMultiple Choice FinalProject BasedResubmission Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; exam format details are sparse.

Project BasedDetailed FeedbackExtra Credit
“ ”
ARTG125
“offers plenty of easy opportunities and even allows you to improve and resubmit older work”
ARTG125

Online

Online sections describe a fairly easy multiple-choice .

Multiple Choice FinalEasy Final QuizResubmit Assignments
“ .”
ARTG125
“multiple choice and fairly easy.”
ARTG125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far, the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (6 online, 21 in , and beginner support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Professor Warren has a great way of condensing loads of material into simple, clear videos to learn the tools of graphic design.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ , and would take this class again!”

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures clearly, slowly, and helps everyone who needs extra help
  • she is so thorough in the way she teaches and describes things

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Course work takes effort, but and you will learn a lot.
  • .
  • She makes you work for because if you get an A, you deserve that A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Julie is one of the .
  • Really funny teacher and sarcastic
  • Julie became rude and defensive when asked about functions she was not comfortable with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews spanning many years with highly consistent praise for , and beginner support.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTG12519 reviews
ART1252 reviews
516471 review
ARTG1441 review
CRN516471 review
Show 3 more courses
DIGITALMEDIA1 review
DIGITMEDI1 review
DIGMEDIA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 11

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1