AI Rate Professor

English

Christina Fithian

LING355 · LING200 · ENGL101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her for writing-focused English, but expect and avoid if you need timely grades in linguistics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent GradingPatient With WritersHomework HeavyMixed Course QualitySlow Feedback
  • English 101 students praise patient teaching and strong writing growth.
  • Linguistics reviews slam slow or and inconsistency.
  • and workload can be lecture- and homework-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students report high grades, but , and class attention rather than minimal effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-range; - and test-heavy while others feel manageable for strong writers.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and one tags that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Half the sample loves her teaching while the and inconsistent.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

High final grades appear common, but delayed or .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

LING200 is lecture- and ; ENGL101 feels lighter for skilled writers.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Patient, inspirational lectures in some courses contrast with .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tests depending on the course.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

ENGL101 and LING200 feel supportive and strong, while LING355 feels average-to-poor due to ungraded work and inconsistency.

Main concern

, so you may not know if you are on track.

What students said

“10/10 amazing teacher.”
ENGL101
“Extremely inconsistent and does not grade the work she assigns.”
LING355
“Really great professor that and and wants you to pass.”
LING200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Test-heavy tags appear for LING200, but reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework; exact exam security rules are not clearly described.

Test heavyHomework heavy
“It is very lecture and , but you don't need to read every chapter in the book as long as and pay attention in the lectures during class.”
LING200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's pretty amazing... I saw her make great writers out of them. She has great examples, is very good with class discussions, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting course-level splits between strong English teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

✍️ Writing Mentorship

85/100

“for those where English is not a make great writers out of them.”

🐢 Slow Ungraded Work

25/100

“Extremely inconsistent and does not grade the work she assigns.”

📚

40/100

“It is very lecture and ”

⚖️ Split Reputation

52/100

“Very average Professor, in quality and effort.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really great professor that and and wants you to pass.
  • She has great examples, is very good with class discussions, and is patient
  • 10/10 amazing teacher.

Theme 2

📝

  • You will not get your grade for an .
  • it felt like the whole semester she was
  • Extremely inconsistent and does not grade the work she assigns.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 recent reviews with split opinions by course; detail is solid but sample size limits confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LING3552 reviews
ENGL1011 review
LING2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1