AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

M Harlow

PHILO101 · PHIL101 · SUST101 · PHILO100 · PHIL100 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will attend and do the and supportive teaching.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy A with EffortExtra Credit QueenAmazing LecturesCaring & FunnyHomework Mirrors Exams
  • Nearly all , and unwilling to let you fail.
  • but reviewed in class for full credit; .
  • and corrections make high grades realistic for engaged students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Multiple students call it an easy A if , and use .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Material can feel dry or puzzle-like at first, but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Several reviews say attendance or participation is required to pass and keep the grade up.

In-person comments emphasize showing up; no online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Overwhelming praise and 100% would-take-again among those who answered make her a top recommendation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

tests, and effort-based points make grading highly forgiving.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Lots of homework and group work, but and grade-boosting rather than crushing.

Format shift

Workload comments are all in-person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly , and able to revive dry philosophy topics.

Format shift

Consistent excellence across nearly two decades of in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and a few tests that mirror homework drive the grade.

Format shift

but aligned exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person philosophy and related courses feel fun and animated; students get easy , and using abundant .

Main concern

Attendance and ; group work and .

What students said

“She cares so much she won't let you fail, gives a lot of so if you messed up on the .”
PHIL101
“Come to class and do the .”
PHIL100
“The . Excellent instructor.”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one older outlier said the final differed, but and predictable.

Exams like homeworkExtra credit after testsFew tests per term

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are described as ; one older review warned the final felt mismatched.

Homework-style examsExtra credit recoveryClass participation
“The .”
PHIL101
“The final however, is completely different from the style and structure of her class.”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Come to class and do the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching energy, easy-A mechanics, and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Cathy is an amazing professor! She is inspirational and very caring.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

88/100

“This is one of the easiest A's I have ever earned.”

🎁 Safety Net

90/100

“gives a lot of so if you messed up on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • livens up the dry topics
  • Amazing lectures
  • fun and engaging

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A
  • Did not read the book and got an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • won't let you fail
  • extremely helpful
  • Inspirational

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen in-person reviews from 2007-2022 show strong thematic consistency on teaching quality and easy grades, with only sparse older negatives.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL10011 reviews
PHIL1014 reviews
PHILO1012 reviews
PHILO1001 review
SUST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values