AI Rate Professor

English

Alejandra Canaan

ENG115 · ENG47A · ENG101 · ENG150 · ENG120 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if and can handle a real writing load; avoid if you need a light paper course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackInspirationalLots of homeworkClear grading criteriaCaring
  • Many students love her humor, workshops, and and composition courses.
  • ENG101 can feel paper-heavy and hard, with some D grades when workload piles up.
  • Lower-level or creative sections can feel fun and manageable with flexible late work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Creative and lower-level classes can yield easy As with feedback and late work, but ENG101 paper volume makes an A far from automatic.

Online screenwriting felt fun and doable; in-person ENG101 is the hard-grade cluster.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Average difficulty is high and students flag lots of papers, reading, and inventive writing challenges.

In-person ENG101 drives the challenge score; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most reviews mark attendance yes; one lower-level .

; only ENG47A sounded flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and energy, while a minority would not take her again after heavy ENG101 loads.

Online review is positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , and some sections accept late email work for full credit, but Ds appear when volume overwhelms.

Format shift

In-person lower-level flexibility contrasts with strict ENG101 outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple reviews cite lots of homework and so many papers, especially in ENG101.

Format shift

In-person ENG101 drives the heavy label; creative courses still expect writing work.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise entertaining lectures, humor, workshops, and personal investment in better writing.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong online and in person even when workload is criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and writing projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students split between praise for , and growth, and complaints that ENG101 piles on homework and papers.

Main concern

Heavy paper and if you fall behind.

What students said

“This class will challenge you in fun and inventive new ways to bring your writing and English up to the next level.”
ENG115
“ .”
ENG101
“This is the easiest class ever.”
ENG47A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online screenwriting student called the class one of the more fun English courses taken, with story-building and film-scene analysis.

Main concern

Single-review sample makes online workload hard to judge.

What students said

“Definitely one of the more fun classes that I've ever taken.”
ENG150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing-centered with workshops and many papers; .

Writing workshopsMultiple papersHomework-heavyExtra creditFlexible late work

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and ; reviews do not clearly document proctored exams.

Many papersWorkshopsHomework
“ .”
ENG101
“we were still able to do things like group workshops and interact with classmates.”
ENG120

Online

Online screenwriting focused on story building, screenplay-style writing, and film-scene analysis rather than traditional exams.

Screenplay writingScene analysis
“focused more on building a story and writing it in screen play style and analyzing scenes from different modern classic films”
ENG150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wants your writing to improve and you to pass her class. She's always there and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She has a great balance with conducting an amazing lecture and keeping the atmosphere light with some humor.”

📝 Workload Reality

30/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ !”

✍️

85/100

“She's always there and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really fun class.
  • She was amazing! I enjoyed going to her lectures because she made them entertaining.
  • encourages the class to be close knit

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Although she gives lots of and topics
  • This is the easiest class ever.
  • the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Profe is an amazing person and awesome professor to learn from.
  • Caring
  • She is a realy good teacher forever the best.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews with and negative clusters give a usable picture, but the sample is still modest.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENG1152 reviews
ENG1201 review
ENG1501 review
ENG47A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values