AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Nancy Krispen

CHEM152 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

review; seek another Chem instructor if possible.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderConfusingNo feedbackMismatch assignmentsAvoid
  • Single review strongly
  • Assignments and and error-prone
  • Passed only with help from the lab teacher, not her instruction

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tough grader tag, difficulty 5, and student says they only passed thanks to the lab teacher.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Maximum difficulty rating and comments that material and .

All evidence is in-person CHEM152.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and explicitly added the review to warn others away.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and confusing graded work.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Workload intensity is ; no claim of light work.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Confusing instruction, typos that break questions, and .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions assignments and question sets that differ from studied material; .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM152 described as , and unhelpful, with tough grading and .

Main concern

Assignments differ from studied material and .

What students said

“Don't take this professor. off a question, and does not provide feedback.”
CHEM152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assignments and questions can differ from studied material and contain typos; .

Mismatched assignmentsTypos in questionsNo feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assignments look completely different from material studied; typos can throw off questions; .

Mismatched assignmentsQuestion typosNo feedback
“The studied.”
CHEM152
“ off a question, and does not provide feedback.”
CHEM152

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I added this teacher just to warn people. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting warning, confusion, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Strong Warning

5/100

“I added this teacher just to warn people. .”

🧩

8/100

“ off a question, and does not provide feedback.”

🧪 Saved by Lab Teacher

12/100

“The only reason I passed was thanks to my lab teacher .”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Teaching Problems

  • off a question, and does not provide feedback.
  • The studied.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades & Survival

  • The only reason I passed was thanks to my lab teacher .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2020 exists, so but sample size and consistency cannot be verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values