AI Rate Professor

Electronics Technology

Fred Julian

EDLT123 · ENGE240 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

A solid choice if you want a and are willing to ask questions and keep up with homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorExtra CreditIndustry ExperienceLots of HomeworkRespected
  • Students describe him as caring and
  • Class difficulty is moderate with
  • One course tags lots of homework;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Both reviewers earned B grades in moderate-difficulty courses, not a free A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Described as not too hard overall, but .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and emphasize care, respect, and industry experience.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tags include ; reported grades were B with supportive help available.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

One review tags lots of homework; students still needed to engage and ask questions.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and post-class career help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and understanding checks but .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Both students found him nice and and a willingness to help beyond the classroom.

Main concern

Homework load and unless they ask more questions.

What students said

“ and cares about his students. He really just wants to help you understand.”
ENGE240
“Overall am excellent professor with lots of pre-instructor engineering work experience brought to the table.”
EDLT123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

formats or policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Julian is a good professor. and cares about his students. He really just wants to help you understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with limited sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Student Care

80/100

“Even after the semester is over, he is still trying to help students get a job.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ to swat a fly that wandered into the kitchen...”

📚 Workload Note

35/100

“Lots of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • at times
  • Amazing lectures
  • lots of pre-instructor engineering work experience

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • really nice and cares about his students
  • Respected, Caring
  • still trying to help students get a job

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2019-2020 with limited detail and no long-term consensus.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EDLT1231 review
ENGE2401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values