AI Rate Professor

Electronics Technology

A Julian

ENGE240 · ENGR240 · ELDT143 · MFET110 · ELDT123 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take him if and ; sit front-row and do not expect dynamic lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProQuiet LecturerMixed ClarityHelpful When AskedReading RequiredSplit Opinions
  • Students split between chill easy-A experiences and frustration with .
  • Success often requires , and heavy textbook reading.
  • Older sparse reviews limit confidence; newer comments are sharply divided.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student calls it an Easy A with homework and three exams, but others call him a and hard to learn from.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits mid-range; quiet lectures and suggest.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

One review ; most older reviews omit it.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half of students with ; others strongly advise picking someone else.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One Easy A report contrasts with and mixed grades, pointing to fair but uneven outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and and no quizzes in one course description.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Praised as nice and helpful by some, but multiple students say he is too quiet and weak at explaining concepts.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

One detailed review cites .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person engineering and electronics reviews range from easy A with hear and .

Main concern

Quiet delivery and weak explanations force heavy self-study; some say wait .

What students said

“Prof Julian is chill and easy. It is true he is kinda quiet and you have to sit upfront for better hearing.”
ENGR240
“he also is bad when it comes to explaining the concept of the class in general i would advise pick another teacher”
ENGE240
“Professor Julian is one of the nicest, and he is the .”
MFET110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one student reports three exams and .

Three examsGraded homeworkNo quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention three exams and .

Three examsGraded homeworkNo quizzes
“3 Exams no quizzes, do have to turn in your hw for grading. Easy A for me.”
ENGR240

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Julian is chill and easy. It is true he is kinda quiet and you have to sit upfront for better hearing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews with mixed eras and detail levels. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

40/100

“he also is bad when it comes to explaining the concept of the class in general i would advise pick another teacher”

😎 Easy Path for Self-Starters

70/100

“You have to put in the and because thats what he expects u to do). Easy A for me.”

🤝 Helpfulness

75/100

“Professor Julian is one of the nicest, and he is the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“I reccomend him to everyone that .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is kinda quiet and you have to sit upfront for better hearing
  • he also is bad when it comes to explaining the concept
  • Professor Julian is one of the nicest, and he is the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A for me.
  • He's not THAT hard either though.

Theme 3

📖

  • and
  • Get ready to read
  • wait

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews span 2005-2020, but several are old or empty of comments, and opinions sharply conflict.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR2402 reviews
ELDT1231 review
ELDT1431 review
ENGE2401 review
MFET1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1