AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jennifer Nevius

ENGE101 · ENGR200 · MFET115 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Fine for intro engineering with ; think twice before taking her for upper-division ENGR200.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCourse-dependent qualityClear grading criteriaCaring in intro coursesQuiz-heavy upper divisionNotes allowed on exams
  • Intro ENGE101 reviewers found minimal work and an easy path to A+.
  • MFET115 students say she explains hard algebra clearly and allows .
  • One ENGR200 review strongly warns she cannot solve problems and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Intro classes look like easy As with homework, but ENGR200 and tougher courses demand .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty jumps from very light intro work to math-heavy MFET and quiz-intense upper division.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory for her engineering sections.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Three of , but the ENGR200 review is a strong avoid signal.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear criteria and on denser courses.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Minimal work in ENGE101, lots of homework and quizzes in other courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praised as nice and problem solving.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Homework and projects matter, but quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

to a harsh ENGR200 critique about weak problem-solving and constant quizzes.

Main concern

Upper-division readiness and .

What students said

“Should not be qualified to teach upper division engineering courses. She is unable to solve the problems herself when asked to do so by students”
ENGR200
“I probably couldve skipped out on most of the semester and passed. She assigns minimal work that can be done by quick online research.”
ENGE101
“Prof. Nevius goes through the material in an easy to understand manner. , but she allows for a limited amount of notes”
MFET115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one course also relies heavily on in-class quizzes.

Cumulative examsLimited notes allowedFrequent quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; ENGR200 is described as quiz-heavy with short lectures.

Cumulative examsLimited notesMultiple quizzes
“ , but she allows for a limited amount of notes you can put together to use with the exam.”
MFET115
“The rest of the time in class is used for . We are quizzed on topics more then we are taught.”
ENGR200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far, one of the most nicest and class. As long as you do your homework, you'll pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with high course-to-course variance. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Upper-Division Warning

20/100

“Should not be qualified to teach upper division engineering courses. She is unable to solve the problems herself when asked to do so by students”

💚

78/100

“one of the most nicest and class”

📝

65/100

“she allows for a limited amount of notes you can put together to use with the exam.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes through the material in an easy to understand manner
  • basically reads off a powerpoint the 30 minutes that she does decided to lecture
  • shes nice, but

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She assigns minimal work that can be done by quick online research
  • As long as

Theme 3

📋 About Assessment

  • We are quizzed on topics more then we are taught
  • has a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with polar opposite course experiences limit reliability of any single overall claim.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGE1012 reviews
ENGR2001 review
MFET1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values