AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

C Thomas

MATH255 · MATH121 · CALC116 · MATH141 · DIFFEQ · MATH46 · TRIG104 · MATH252 · MATH245 · MATH96 · MATH35 · CALCULUS · MATH035 · MATH150 · MATH151 · MATH119 · MATH104 · DIFFEQS · 125 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you already excel in math and accept strict, high-stakes testing; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing teacherTough graderDaily quizzesNo calculators oftenFinal can fail you
  • Serious math students sometimes praise rigorous lectures and office hours.
  • , and .
  • grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong semester work can collapse if you miss the final threshold, and .

Online and ; in-person adds no-calculator closed testing.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Pace is fast, explanations are often incomplete for weaker students, and content assumes strong prior skill.

Lower online algebra can feel doable; calc and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as , and phone penalties.

In-person is clearly strict; online focuses more on weekly due dates than seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half recommend her for rigor and humor, while and .

Online recommendations are thinner and more negative on teaching support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and final-fail policies dominate negative grade experiences.

Format shift

; in-person adds no-calculator strictness.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, daily quizzes, and .

Format shift

but more flexible timing; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call her the best and funniest math teacher, while many and goes off topic.

Format shift

In-person is highly polarized; online often feels unsupported.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests and with daily quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews split hard between hilarious accessible teaching and complaints of , and brutal no-calculator tests.

Main concern

Strict attendance, heavy testing, and .

What students said

“ . +. Test are terribly difficult.”
MATH252
“ !! This professor expects you to know everything”
MATH141
“if you fail the .”
MATH104

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online work leans on MyMathLab with and quizzes, but several students say you teach yourself and a .

Main concern

turn an A semester into a D.

What students said

“You learn on your own. She did not teach AT ALL. Horrible online professor.”
MATH104
“you have to get a 60% or higher on the or C in the course.”
MATH121
“You have until the end of the and you can always re do HW.”
MATH96

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently closed-resource and harsh, and failing the .

No calculators oftenNo notes on many finalsDaily quizzesFinal can determine course gradePractice tests sometimes helpful

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person testing often bans calculators and notes, uses daily quizzes, and applies strict notation and .

No calculatorsNo notes on testsDaily quizzesStrict gradingHard tests
“There is not calculators allowed.”
MATH121
“There are no notes or . .”
MATH141

Online

Online courses use MyMathLab homework and high-stakes finals that can override the semester grade.

MyMathLab quizzes and testsTwo attempts sometimesOn-campus finalFinal score gate
“ !! Three tests, one on-campus final. For the , double sided!”
MATH104
“I had an A going into the final but failed it leaving me with a D!”
MATH121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want the A . If you are serious about Math and . Thomas.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarization on teaching quality, strict rules, and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

55/100

“This is THE !”

🚫 Easy A Reality

28/100

“if you fail the .”

📌

18/100

“she is VERY strict ”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ !! i swear my whole class loves her!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is hilarious and does a great job of explaining the material
  • .
  • Talks about irrelevant stuff in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • NO . !!!!
  • all of the homework.

Theme 3

📝 About Rules and Exams

  • There is not calculators allowed.
  • .
  • you have to get a 60% or higher on the or C in the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

125

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show a stable but , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 570
4 out of 514
3 out of 519
2 out of 510
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH1218 reviews
MATH968 reviews
MATH1047 reviews
MATH466 reviews
MATH1415 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATH2453 reviews
MATH1512 reviews
CALC1161 review
CALCULUS1 review
DIFFEQ1 review
DIFFEQS1 review
MATH0351 review
MATH1191 review
MATH1501 review
MATH2521 review
MATH2551 review
MATH351 review
TRIG1041 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 1