AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Jonathon Riveron

ENGE151 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid if possible; the only two reviews call the class awful with and heavy work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots Of HomeworkGraded By Few ThingsJust AwfulHigh Difficulty
  • Both reviews rate quality at 1 with
  • , and few graded items
  • Almost no useful teaching detail beyond pure dissatisfaction

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and mixed reported grades (A and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty ratings of 4-5 and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

; little else is said about attendance.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is 0% and both comments reduce the experience to awful.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and an .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Tags list lots of homework, so many papers, and graded by few things.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Both quality scores are 1 with only one-word or slang negative comments.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Tags emphasize papers and ; exams not described.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Two sparse in-person reviews both give quality 1 and and heavy workload.

Main concern

Extremely negative tone with almost no constructive teaching detail.

What students said

“Just awful”
ENGE151
“Riveron on some soma ngl”
ENGE151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just awful”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews with very low detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Just awful”

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Riveron on some soma ngl”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Just awful”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Just awful
  • Riveron on some soma ngl

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just awful
  • Riveron on some soma ngl

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 very short in-person reviews with minimal detail and no consistency beyond shared negativity.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGE1512 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values