AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jarryd Willis

PSYCH258 · PYSC258 · PSYC258 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

; plan to teach yourself the course and expect a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProIneffective CommunicatorUnprofessionalSelf-Teach RequiredLast-Minute ChaosTalks Down to Students
  • Students say he knows the material but confused.
  • Multiple reports of unprofessional behavior, including hitting on students, pettiness, and talking down to everyone.
  • Expect , and heavy self-teaching to survive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Hard content plus poor organization and unreturned work mean an A .

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Difficulty ratings near 5 and tags for papers, pop quizzes, and lecture-heavy content show a demanding psychology course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Most students report and skip-class-you-will-not-pass tags.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

; every review urges students not to enroll.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; work often unreturned and last-minute changes add stress.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report many papers, pop quizzes, and lecture-heavy demands on top of self-teaching.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Knowledgeable on paper but ineffective lectures, confusion, and unprofessional conduct dominate reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of papers, pop quizzes, tests, and lecture-based expectations with shifting deadlines.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person PSYC/PSYCH 258 students describe , last-minute changes, unreturned work, and unprofessional conduct.

Main concern

Poor communication and unprofessional behavior make the hard content even harder.

What students said

“Nothing was written out on the board or explained thoroughly. Most of the .”
PYSC258
“Unprofessional, hits on students and is very petty. Talks down .”
PSYCH258
“communicating with him is impossible, and did not return our work. Expect to teach yourself.”
PSYC258

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes and last-minute assignment or .

Pop QuizzesLast-Minute Test ChangesLecture Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and last-minute emails changing tests the morning they are due.

Pop QuizzesMany PapersLast-Minute Changes
“So and test the morning that they are due.”
PSYCH258
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES, SO ”
PSYCH258

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unprofessional, hits on students and is very petty. Talks down .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting poor teaching and unprofessional conduct. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Nothing was written out on the board or explained thoroughly. Most of the .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

📚

25/100

“Expect to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nothing was written out on the board or explained thoroughly.
  • his teaching skills severely lacked any substance
  • Most of the .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Conduct & Organization

  • Unprofessional, hits on students and is very petty.
  • last minute emails changing assignments and .
  • communicating with him is impossible, and did not return our work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three detailed in-person reviews from late 2018, highly consistent in tone but limited sample and older time span.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC2581 review
PSYCH2581 review
PYSC2581 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1