AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Daniel Melera

60528EXSC · 242B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; with only two opposite reviews, outcomes seem highly course- and expectation-dependent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing PE instructorKnowledgeable lecturesMandatory attendanceLimited hands-onSelf-focused talk
  • Only two reviews and they completely disagree on quality.
  • One student praises knowledge and lectures; the other calls the class a waste of time.
  • A and lack of hands-on practice are concrete red flags.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student still earned an A while calling the class a joke, but no broad easy-A pattern is established from only two reviews.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range and content may require outside practice; .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and one would not, matching a 50 percent take-again rate and fully split reviews.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One A is reported, but a , so grading reliability is uncertain.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

One course needed outside practice and book reading; workload and lectures.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Equal weight of excellent lecture praise and harsh claims of wasted time and self-centered talk.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

A ; hands-on practice was expected outside class.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Two in-person PE-related reviews split between excellent knowledgeable lectures and a joke class with and little hands-on work.

Main concern

Very small sample with opposite opinions; and self-focused talk are noted.

What students said

“Awesome teacher. Very knowledgeable. Gives great lectures and topic.”
60528EXSC
“This class was a joke and a waste of time, read the book and you'll learn it.”
242B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

A ; one review says the was wrong and all exams were re-graded.

Midterm examAnswer key error reportedLecture based

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

a full re-grade; little else is specified.

Midterm examAnswer key errorRe-grade
“Our midterm he couldn't even get his own correct so he had to re-grade all of our exams.”
242B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome teacher. Very knowledgeable. Gives great lectures and topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from only 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Knowledgeable lectures

80/100

“Awesome teacher. Very knowledgeable. Gives great lectures and topic.”

🚫 Waste of time claim

20/100

“This class was a joke and a waste of time, read the book and you'll learn it.”

📝

30/100

“Our midterm he couldn't even get his own correct so he had to re-grade all of our exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gives great lectures and topic.
  • He's very full of himself and likes to talk a lot about the athletes he's working with.

Theme 2

📈 About Course Value

  • Class needed a lot more hands on experience, we had to practice outside of class.
  • This class was a joke and a waste of time, read the book and you'll learn it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two opposite in-person reviews from 2018 provide almost no consistent pattern; conclusions should be treated as provisional.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

242B1 review
60528EXSC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values