AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Geri Iorio

MATH46 · MATH160 · MATH35 · MATH34A · MATH96 · MATH046 · MATH096 · MATH303 · MATH119 · MATH38 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and tolerate strict classroom rules; otherwise look for another section.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizingStrict attendanceTest heavyMistakes in lectureSelf-teach required
  • some call her the best math teacher, others the
  • , and late/absent penalties are consistent
  • Many students say lectures have errors or come straight from the book so self-teaching is needed

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earn As with effort, but and teaching gaps make an A unreliable.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Lower-level math content is standard, but pace, confusion, and .

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Leaving the room, phones, or late arrival can mark you absent or get you dropped.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and many urge others to stay away despite a vocal minority of fans.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria appear for some, but test-heavy design and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure show up across reviews.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Praise for patience and humor is outweighed by frequent claims of mistakes, lateness, and unprepared lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and packets dominate assessment talk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

MyMathLab homework, and highly mixed teaching quality reports.

Main concern

Lecture mistakes, unpreparedness, and .

What students said

“Makes mistakes every single time she shows an example.”
MATH303
“be prepared to teach yourself the material.”
MATH119
“She is the .”
MATH38

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and packets often feel disconnected from unclear lectures, raising student risk.

Test heavyExams not always lecture-alignedMyMathLab homework

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests are frequent and several students say questions were not explained in class or texts.

Test heavyPacket-basedMyMathLab
“the not explained by her or the texts.”
MATH119
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH303

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Being dropped from this class is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person reviews capturing polarized teaching quality and strict rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Makes mistakes every single time she shows an example.”

🚪

8/100

“anytime you leave the room you'll be marked absent”

👍 Split Recommendations

35/100

“stay away!”

❤️ Supportive Minority

70/100

“She is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • constantly makes mistakes
  • lecture is straight from book
  • Very good at explaining things

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TEST HEAVY
  • be prepared to teach yourself
  • The class was ez

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Rules

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • she will kick you out and mark you absent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

17 reviews with detailed conflicting experiences across 2012-2018 form a .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH385 reviews
MATH1193 reviews
MATH462 reviews
MATH0461 review
MATH0961 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1601 review
MATH3031 review
MATH34A1 review
MATH351 review
MATH961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1