AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Soheila Beladi

CHEM110 · CHEM100 · 151L · CHEM201 · CHEM200 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
53.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will attend, drill examples, and and uneven lecture clarity.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing ChemTough GraderPop QuizzesLots of ExamplesHard to Follow
  • Reviews split hard between best chem teacher and
  • , and tests matter;
  • Accent and lecture

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some report A thresholds and , but and heavy testing make an A hard-won.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry content plus fast pace, quizzes, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Skip-class warnings and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half praise deep learning and examples while half urge avoiding and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and point-docking complaints outweigh reports of and A at 85%.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Strong positive and strong negative camps cancel out around average overall teaching quality.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Pop quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chemistry reviews are sharply split: many praise examples and real , and heavy quiz or test pressure.

Main concern

and hard-to-follow lectures make the experience high-risk.

What students said

“I learned so much in her class. she was always ready to answer my questions.”
CHEM201
“She makes things that should be simple extremely complicated.”
CHEM200
“One of the .”
CHEM201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect and and strong attendance pressure.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyHomework Aligns to ExamsStrict Point Docking

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and homework-linked exam questions with .

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyHomework to Exam AlignmentStrict Grading
“She gives many pop quizzes which are meant to prepare you for the exams.”
CHEM200
“The questions in the .”
CHEM201
“ and then a couple more points off for no reason.”
CHEM200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course material itself was not that difficult, but the course load was ridiculous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, highlighting the strong positive-negative split in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“For the first time I truly understood chemistry in her class.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and then a couple more points off for no reason.”

📉

30/100

“ and unhelpful.”

👍 For Some Learners

70/100

“I learned so much in her class. She is one of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes over lots of examples in the lecture
  • She constantly made mistakes during the lecture
  • She is incomprehensible to say the least

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she gives an A if you get an 85% in the class
  • , but if you study the powerpoints and the textbook you should be ok
  • She is an

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • She is inconsistent with the information given to you
  • while lecturing
  • Even if you do exactly what she tells you, you will still be wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine detailed reviews over many years with pattern.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM20016 reviews
CHEM1006 reviews
CHEM2015 reviews
151L1 review
CHEM1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1