AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katherine Engelman

MATH096 · MATH116 · MATH121 · MATH104 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend every lecture, copy notes carefully, and put .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyClear NotesCaring Math TeacherWeekly HomeworkMandatory Attendance
  • , and caring support.
  • Classes are lecture-heavy and can feel repetitive or boring.
  • Attendance and ; tests are manageable if you keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are reported when students attend and , but tough-grader and work.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits around medium with accelerated options feeling harder and content paced by dense lectures.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students who engage with lectures and ; a minority dislike the repetitive lecture style.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear grading criteria help, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and care, with boredom as the main complaint.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

One review states homework is 50 percent with midterm and final each 25 percent, plus online homework and no quizzes in another class.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and supportive for serious students who show up and practice.

Main concern

Repetitive board lectures and .

What students said

“Just amazing. Lectures heavy, but if you write down her notes, you'll have a very condensed version of a textbook.”
MATH104
“Homework is 50%, midterm 25% and final 25%.”
MATH121
“It was boring just look at her solving some problems on the board every single day.”
MATH116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final; tests feel fair if you attend and practice.

Midterm and finalTests easy if preparedNo quizzes in some sectionsOnline homework

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals with homework weight, and tests are described as easy if you go to class and .

Midterm and finalTests easy if preparedNo quizzes in some sections
“Homework is 50%, midterm 25% and final 25%.”
MATH121
“ if you go to class and . .”
MATH104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Engelman is truly one of the sweetest math professors you'll ever find in city college!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person math , and care. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

82/100

“if you write down her notes, you'll have a very condensed version of a textbook.”

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“ , and will answer every question, no matter how stupid it is.”

📅

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

⚖️ Fair Path to A

58/100

“ if you go to class and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her class is very lecture heavy
  • you just look at her solve some problems everyday
  • She is extremely patient with her students questions and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Homework is 50%, midterm 25% and final 25%.
  • if you go to class and .
  • You get hw every week.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Shes a nice teacher
  • and caring
  • truly one of the sweetest math professors

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five fairly detailed reviews from 2017-2018 agree on lecture-heavy structure and care, with moderate sample size.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1212 reviews
MATH0961 review
MATH1041 review
MATH1161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1