AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

K Lollis

MATH121 · MATH9596 · MATH096WEB · MATH35 · MATH101 · MATH96 · MATH95 · MATH046 · MATH038 · MATH032 · M95SUMMER05 · MATH94 · MATH32 · MATH104WEB · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Only take her if you already handle math well and ; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing math teacherLots of homeworkFast-paced lecturesHard finalsSelf-study heavy
  • and cold, rushed, unhelpful lectures.
  • and high-stakes finals mean you usually earn the grade through practice.
  • Online and little real teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students say you earn the grade through heavy practice, and a .

Online reviews are especially harsh on learning support; in-person reviews stress practice and hard finals.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Material is often review-level for strong students but feels fast and unforgiving for weaker ones.

In-person comments dominate; online notes focus more on software than content depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn that skipping hurts.

Mandatory notes appear mainly in recent in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About 40% would take again, with strong praise from self-sufficient students and .

; in-person reviews are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Fair if you perform, but and little partial-help make grades feel unforgiving.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of and students say the course needs significant weekly time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Quality and rushed or disinterested teaching.

Format shift

In-person is mixed; online is mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, but finals and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and condescending.

Main concern

Pace and strong.

What students said

“Practice, practice, go to office hours, and you will get an A. You earn your grade.”
MATH121
“If you don’t do well on the .”
MATH96
“Shes super condescending to students and treats us like second class citizens.”
MATH121

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

software-heavy, little teaching, and weak help when students get stuck.

Main concern

Students report buggy courseware and .

What students said

“ . The professor is a hall monitor for the online software.”
MATH104WEB
“When requesting help concerning problem, she just gives answer and not how to work thru it.”
MATH046

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as clear but and decisive for the course grade.

Hard finalHigh-stakes testsLots of homework

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals hard enough to fail the course.

Hard finalClear testsLengthy homework
“If you don’t do well on the . The !”
MATH96
“the and her teaching style was reasonable.”
MATH121

Online

Online reviews do not clearly detail proctoring; they stress error-filled software and weak problem teaching.

Online softwareLittle direct teaching
“Dont expect her to teach you anything. Its an online software riddled with errors, typos and half-relevant videos”
MATH104WEB
“she just gives answer and not how to work thru it.”
MATH046

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Practice, practice, go to office hours, and you will get an A. You earn your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews (2 online, 25 in-person), highlighting polarization in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She seemed generally disinterested in being in class, like shes often just phoning it in.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“ so stay on top of it.”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

42/100

“ ! !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and stop if you have a question
  • Shes super condescending to students
  • and will work with you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You earn your grade
  • The
  • The material isnt challenging at all

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • online software riddled with errors
  • she just gives answer and not how to work thru it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews over many years give volume, but opinions are highly polarized and many older comments lack grade detail.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH967 reviews
MATH354 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
MATH953 reviews
M95SUMMER051 review
Show 9 more courses
MATH0321 review
MATH0381 review
MATH0461 review
MATH096WEB1 review
MATH1011 review
MATH104WEB1 review
MATH321 review
MATH941 review
MATH95961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2