AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Georgia Uselman

MATH · MATH46 · MATH35 · MATH3886164 · MATH96 · MATH95 · MATH046 · MATH038 · USELMAN27938 · MATH096 · MATH38 · AA · MATH035 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and can tolerate a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkRude and CondescendingTest HeavyUnclear Lectures
  • Many students call her rude, condescending, and disrespectful toward learners.
  • and test-focused grading make the class high-effort with low clarity.
  • 0% would take again among those who answered; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and test weight make an A costly even when some students eventually pass.

Almost ; the one online review also stresses heavy work and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content and pace feel hard for many, with and lots of assigned practice.

In-person reviews dominate; online notes similar difficulty with scattered lessons.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and she is strict about lateness and classroom behavior.

; online review does not clarify attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

, and many comments urge students to run.

Both the single online review and the bulk of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and test-heavy tags plus student reports of high pressure for full credit.

Format shift

; in-person has far more evidence.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework is a constant theme, including reports of .

Format shift

Online review mentions 200 homework questions day one; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Avg quality is low; many call lectures book-reading, unclear, unorganized, or disrespectful, with some older praise.

Format shift

In-person is mixed but mostly negative; the one online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy tags and comments that and .

Format shift

Assessment detail .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and frequent reports of rudeness, with a minority of older positive reviews.

Main concern

Rude demeanor plus heavy workload and .

What students said

“It can be .”
MATH096
“ . SAVE YOURSELVES FROM A NIGHTMARE.”
MATH96
“So first let me say that this professor is extremely rude.”
MATH046

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review , and crushing homework volume.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I would not recommend this classs save yourself donttt do itttttt really run for your life!”
USELMAN27938

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Test HeavyHomework Supports TestsIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review days, without clear open-book or software proctoring claims.

Test HeavyIn-Person TestsReview Day Before Tests
“on the other hand, she gives us a whole day of review for the tests.”
MATH46
“ ”
MATH038

Online

but does not describe webcam or .

Test HeavyHeavy Homework
“homework was 200 questions the 1st day”
USELMAN27938

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . SAVE YOURSELVES FROM A NIGHTMARE. TAKE MATH WITH ANOTHER TEACHER.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching tone, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“I would not recommend this classs save yourself donttt do itttttt really run for your life!”

😤 Teaching Tone

30/100

“not a good Professor. Does not Respect Students.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“ as well, way too much.”

📉 Clarity

28/100

“ and tells you to do the work without telling you how to do it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't really explain concepts or what she's doing, she just does it.
  • all she does is review examples in the book
  • she is a very dry person with her teaching

Theme 2

😤 About Character

  • this professor is extremely rude
  • condescending and rude behavior towards her students
  • She is unprofessional, condescending, and rude

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You need to be a dedicated person to pass this class
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • TEST HEAVY

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

58

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years with , and unclear teaching, despite some older positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 526

Course coverage

MATH3514 reviews
MATH387 reviews
MATH0465 reviews
MATH4 reviews
MATH464 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH954 reviews
MATH963 reviews
MATH0352 reviews
MATH0382 reviews
MATH0962 reviews
AA1 review
MATH38861641 review
USELMAN279381 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1