AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Gregory Shorts

CISC210 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a and can handle textbook reading plus slower grade turnaround.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessible Outside ClassGood FeedbackFair GraderTextbook HeavySlow Grader
  • Both reviews rate him a 5 for quality and describe him as fair and helpful.
  • He answers emails promptly and is accessible outside class.
  • and lectures that closely follow the textbook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Difficulty ratings are low and one student earned an A+ in the online section with minimal reported struggle.

A+ evidence is from the online review; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students call difficulty low to moderate and .

Online difficulty is rated 1; the other review rates 2 and mentions learning a lot.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Both quality scores are perfect and the while the other still learned a lot.

Recommendation is positive across online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Described as fair with .

Format shift

Fairness is stated in the in-person-coded review; .

Workload

Light

68/100

Main workload signal is get ready to read, with low difficulty ratings overall.

Format shift

Reading load appears in online tags; .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students rate him and fair, though lectures can mirror the textbook.

Format shift

Online is brief praise; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Comments do not detail a .

Format shift

Neither format clearly documents assessment weights.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Student learned a lot, found him fair and responsive, but wanted more original material and .

Main concern

and heavy reliance on textbook repetition.

What students said

“he is fair and answers emails promptly. I did learn a lot in his class.”
CISC210

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Short positive note with tags for , and accessibility outside class.

Main concern

Comment body is very brief so depth of online teaching style is limited.

What students said

“he is good”
CISC210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do .

Online

Reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is fair and answers emails promptly. I did learn a lot in his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting fairness and accessibility with . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Greg has the potential to be a very good professor.”

📬 Accessibility

85/100

“he is fair and answers emails promptly.”

📚 Textbook Reliance

55/100

“He needs to develop some original material for his class rather than just repeating everything in the textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is good
  • I did learn a lot in his class.
  • repeating everything in the textbook

Theme 2

⏱️ and Grading

  • He is also a .
  • he is fair and answers emails promptly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across many years, one extremely short, so scores are directionally positive but thinly supported.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CISC2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values