AI Rate Professor

English

Abigail Cory

ENG10 · HENGL205 · ENG208215 · ENG205 · ENGL216 · ENG216 · ENGL205 · ENG · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want rigorous English lit and will keep up with , and strict essay standards.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderInteresting LecturesParticipation MattersHeavy ReadingStrict Attendance
  • Lectures and and knowledgeable.
  • , and not guaranteed.
  • Attendance and participation can decide grades even when content mastery is solid.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students , and that an easy A appearance vanishes after the first test.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Reading load, poetry, and higher-level lit analysis make the content demanding for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are graded strictly; skipping or lateness can sink the grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Many praise learning value and lectures, but and repeated toughness keep recommendation mixed.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

, and picky essay standards leave little margin for error.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of reading, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Often called knowledgeable, interesting, and helpful, though some find lectures dry or unforgiving.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and exams rather than one single mode.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person literature courses with engaging content but , and .

Main concern

, and essay mechanics can undercut strong content performance.

What students said

“Homework , exams, classwork was flawless, But and participation which confuses me.”
ENGL205
“She grades HARD; seriously, I mean HARD.”
ENG216
“She is TOUGH! But FAIR.”
ENG205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect , and a long final alongside papers.

Pop QuizzesBlue BookLong FinalParticipation Graded

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments , and a .

Pop QuizzesBlue BookLong Final
“ .”
ENG216
“BRING A BLUE BOOK!!!!!”
ENG208215
“ but the .”
ENGL216

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She grades HARD; seriously, I mean HARD. Pay Attention! The class will seem like an easy A till you get that and realize, passing is not promised.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 and strong lecture quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

26/100

“She grades HARD; seriously, I mean HARD.”

📚 Engaging Content

74/100

“Her lectures are extremely interesting, and she cares about her students.”

🚪

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is TOUGH! But FAIR.
  • She is a tough professor.
  • passing is not promised

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome at history and new perspectives on literature.
  • Definitely not a boring class.
  • Her lectures are extremely interesting

Theme 3

📋

  • and participation
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • you are forced to ask questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 mostly older in-person reviews are detailed enough for patterns, but sparse modern data and few grade reports lower certainty.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2162 reviews
ENGL2052 reviews
ENG1 review
ENG101 review
ENG2051 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG2082151 review
ENGL2161 review
HENGL2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values