AI Rate Professor

Health Education

Gabriela Grant

NUTR150 · EXSC145A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her online nutrition or health classes for a ; yoga is chill if you can attend or make up absences.

Best fit · Easy A HunterChill and understandingClear grading criteriaEasy online workloadLate work acceptedParticipation-focused yoga
  • Online nutrition and , and easy to score well in.
  • , but one NUTR in-person review says she mostly reads textbook PowerPoints.
  • Grades reported are strong (A/A+) when students complete weekly work and show up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students report A/A+ with clear criteria, late-work flexibility, and , and weekly work rather than harsh scoring.

Online reviews stress easy weekly work and late-work leniency; in-person yoga and health also report easy As with participation and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Content is generally light to moderate, with easy projects and online nutrition work, though explained.

Online NUTR is described as easy; in-person yoga is own-pace, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

Multiple classes mark attendance mandatory or say participation matters, though and some health for missed days.

In-person yoga and ; online evidence is limited and mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and organized online classes, despite one critique of lazy textbook lectures.

Online reviews are strongly positive; complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Not a ; , and late work flexibility support strong reported grades.

Format shift

Both formats describe fair or ; online adds late-work flexibility.

Workload

Light

72/100

, and a handful of tests keep load manageable for most students.

Format shift

Online is weekly assignments; and .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students praise organization, feedback, and chill yoga instruction, but with little explanation.

Format shift

and responsive; in-person yoga is strong while one NUTR lecture review is weak.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of weekly assignments, participation, projects, and a load.

Format shift

Online leans assignments; , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Yoga is chill and fair if you participate; general health is easy with reviews and , but one NUTR review calls lectures lazy textbook read-alouds.

Main concern

In-person NUTR teaching quality can feel unengaged, and .

What students said

“She is very chill and understanding. Great yoga instructor. She isn't a .”
EXSC145A
“Her lectures and powerpoints came from the textbook company and she just downloaded them and read them outloud.”
NUTR150
“easy, easy class! she gave 2 mandatory projects which were easy and about 4 test throughout the whole semester”
101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online 8-week NUTR150 is well organized, responsive, and easy with and flexible late work.

Main concern

and the course CD for Nutrition Online.

What students said

“Professor Grant was continuously informative and .”
NUTR150
“Easy class. .”
NUTR150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a and online weekly work; no strict proctoring tools are clearly described.

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Health class uses about four tests with ; yoga grades improvement and participation more than formal exams.

Review before testsProjects and testsParticipation grading
“about 4 test throughout the whole semester but before testing she does !!!”
101
“You just have to show improvement and attend class for participation”
EXSC145A

Online

Online NUTR centers on weekly Nutrition Online assignments; exams are not clearly detailed in comments.

Weekly online assignmentsClear grading criteria
“ .”
NUTR150
“She clearly outlines the criteria and .”
NUTR150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class. . She understands life happens and will accept late work, as long as you aren't turning assignments in late all the time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in person), highlighting ease, organization, and one lecture-quality concern. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Professor Grant was continuously informative and .”

📈 Easy Grades

84/100

“She isn't a . You just have to show improvement and attend class for participation.”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“shes a nice professor! .”

⚠️ Lecture Weak Spot

40/100

“Her lectures and powerpoints came from the textbook company and she just downloaded them and read them outloud.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very chill and understanding. Great yoga instructor.
  • continuously informative and
  • she just downloaded them and read them outloud

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class. .
  • easy, easy class!
  • She isn't a .

Theme 3

📅

  • if you miss a class you can attend a different yoga class for /make up an absent.
  • will accept late work, as long as
  • she gives which is good if you miss class a few times

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews spanning 2015-2017 with some grade data and format split, but small sample and older comments limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR1503 reviews
1011 review
EXSC145A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values